AAA loving Obama
Barack
Obama Campaign Factoids
From Jake Tapper's Political Punch: With 60 days to go before Election Day,
here’s a look at President Obama’s re-election campaign by the numbers:
Total Estimated AF1 Domestic Flight
Miles in 2012: 121,000
Total Bus Tours in 2012: 2
Overnights at Home in Chicago in
2012: 7
Visits to Chicago Campaign HQ: 2
Total Re-Election Fundraisers
Attended in 2012: 139
Total Re-Election Fundraisers in
First Term: 209 (record-breaking; compares
to 86 for George W. Bush)
Are the Democrats scared to death?
I knew
Ronald Reagan. Ronald Reagan was a
friend of mine. And Mitt Romney is reminding me an awful lot of Ronald Reagan.
The MSM and the democrats “do protest
too much, me thinks.” The more you hear
about how well Obama is doing the more you need to discount his chances. They are desperately trying to keep his
voters from being discouraged. And when
friends of Ronald Reagan say things like this, it almost over for Obama.
Obama’s
Welfare Waivers
I’m still looking for the plank
in the Democratic party platform that
endorses work-based welfare reform. It must be there somewhere. If you can
find it, let me know. … P.S.: You would think Obama’s convention speech would also have
been a good place to quickly and forcefully rebut the GOP charge that he
wants to eviscerate welfare work requirements. I can’t find that passage
either.
… Meanwhile, Bill Clinton has told Buzzfeed reporters that “Obama had
asked him to make two modifications to [Clinton's convention] speech — one on
Medicare and one on welfare — but wouldn’t specify what they were.” Hmm ….
4)
Glenn Kessler, WaPo fact-checker, gave Clinton two “Pinocchios” for
claiming that the new Obama”requirement was for more work, not less.” I
would have given him four. Clinton is relying on
Secretary Sebelius “20%” requirement that is a) bogus and b)
was added by the Obama
administration in an apparent damage-control move after
the “waiver” memo was issued. But Kessler’s analysis is more even-handed
than anything Romney’s gotten out of the Checkretariat so far.
Good News! Obama believes in the First Amendment
President Barack
Obama used Air Force One to conduct a policy loop-de-loop Wednesday, asserting
in a CBS interview that he supports
Americans’ right to criticize Islam, following almost 18 hours of
determined condemnation from Team Romney and damaging news from Egypt and Libya.
“We believe in the First Amendment,” Obama told CBS’s Steve Kroft during an
interview arranged days earlier.
After
many in the in the Obama Administration condemned the film makers and even gave
out the name of the filmmaker (putting his life in jeopardy) while MSNBC
commentators called for the filmmaker to be put on trial as an accessory to
murder, it’s nice to see the President still believes we have free speech.
In
the meantime, Google has declined
the White House’s request to review the film with the idea of removing it from
YouTube. It will stay up.
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2012/09/google_defies_government_refuses_to_remove_controversial_anti-islam_video_on_youtube.html
Obama’s chickens are
coming home to roost
The
liberation that Obama hailed so heartily last year, and which he seemed so eager to
endorse and validate, has nakedly
revealed its hatred for the United States and its determination to kill
Americans. Obama’s priorities and
methods have paved the way for the violence and will be unable to contain it;
and the disaster of his approach to foreign policy could not be more obvious.
Former CIA Director Michael Hayden is unequivocal about this, stating that the
protests which resulted in the death of the American ambassador and his
colleagues were the result of Obama’s decision to intervene in the Libyan
revolt without a “deep appreciation” for what would follow.
Jay Carney: Those aren’t our chickens
Even
the media isn’t buying Jay Carney’s
explanation of what causing the violence in the Middle East. This isn’t about a movie, but rather
something bigger. And apparently Barack
Obama’s prediction that Muslim attitudes towards America would soften once he
was president appears to be another sign of Obama’s Hubris.
It was retaliation, not a movie
The consulate in Benghazi was an interim facility,
with only a standard door lock for security, and worse, Ambassador Stevens was traveling with only a light security detail,
rather than in the heavily armed convoys our diplomats in the region usually employ.
The attack on the Benghazi was no mere target of opportunity spurred by
reaction to the “Innocence of Muslims” film;
the film is just a pretext. The
killing of Amb. Stevens was a premeditated hit, planned and carried out as retaliation for the recent drone strike
that killed the number two Al Qaida operative in Afghanistan recently.
No comments:
Post a Comment