Sunday, July 31, 2011

It's a deal!!!

Desperation

The Washington Post and a number of US news sites are reporting THAT TENS OF THOUSANDS OF TWITTER USERS HAVE UNFOLLOWED PRESIDENT OBAMA AFTER BEING DELUGED BY TWEETS ON FRIDAY REQUESTING THEY CONTACT REPUBLICAN LEGISLATORS OVER THE DEBT CEILING ISSUE. According to The Post:

Obama’s official 2012 campaign Twitter account announced to its 9.4 million followers that it would begin publishing the Twitter account names of House Republicans. Over the course of the day, @BARACKOBAMA SENT OUT AROUND 100 TWEETS.

Not everyone was enamored. The account stood at 9.366 million followers by 6 p.m., a loss of more than 30,000 followers. THE WHITE HOUSE’S OFFICIAL ACCOUNT, @WHITEHOUSE, WAS ALSO PUBLISHING TWEETS AT A RAPID-FIRE PACE THROUGHOUT THE DAY.
One would have thought the leader of the free world might have better things to do with his time than spam Twitter with highly partisan tweets that quickly became a major annoyance, the online equivalent of receiving voluminous amounts of junk mail through the post.

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/nilegardiner/100099148/barack-obama%e2%80%99s-vulgar-twitter-spamming-campaign-is-a-classless-act-of-desperation-by-the-us-president/

I thought Obama’s team was supposed to be the masters of using the social networking. It appears a desperate man does desperate things.


GDP Report Shatters Illusion of Jobless, Productivity-Packed Recovery

It's hard to overstate how much today's GDP report blew up our understanding of the recovery. THE RECESSION WAS DEEPER THAN WE KNEW, AND THE ECONOMY IS WEAKER THAN WE THOUGHT. We weren't making new jobs, because we weren't making new things, period. The economy grew less than 1% in the first half of 2011.

Yesterday, analysts thought the economy was expanding by 2.5% a year. This morning, they learned GDP GREW BY ONLY 1.6% IN THE LAST FOUR QUARTERS. This is a remarkable discovery. It's the difference between thinking we're expanding at a decent, if disappointing, pace, and knowing we're growing around half our historical norm…

http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2011/07/gdp-report-shatters-illusion-of-jobless-productivity-packed-recovery/242761/

The economy is a disaster. Spending is a disaster. Obama is a disaster.

Biden: Landlord to the Secret Service

THE U.S. SECRET SERVICE DOES MORE THAN PROTECT VICE PRESIDENT JOSEPH R. BIDEN JR. — THE AGENCY ALSO PAYS HIM RENT.

Since April, Mr. Biden has collected more than $13,000 from the agency charged with protecting him and his family for use of a rental cottage adjacent to the waterfront home he owns in a Wilmington, Del., suburb.

Mr. Biden, listed not as vice president in federal purchasing documents but as a “vendor,” is eligible for up to $66,000 by the time the government contract expires in the fall of 2013, the records show.
Officials say the arrangement came about when a previous tenant moved out of the cottage and the Secret Service moved in.

Edwin M. Donovan, special agent in charge at the Secret Service's Office of Government and Public Affairs in Washington, said THE AGENCY PAYS $2,200 IN RENT PER-MONTH, THE SAME AMOUNT A PREVIOUS TENANT HAD PAID BEFORE MOVING OUT.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/jul/31/biden-charging-secret-service-cottage-rental/

Somehow this doesn’t seem kosher.

Lessons from the Debt Increase

…DEMOCRATS SEEM ESPECIALLY UNHAPPY. They could have avoided the fight in the first place by raising the debt ceiling in the lame duck session in December, when they had large majorities in both houses of Congress.

But they decided not to. REID'S COMMENTS THEN SUGGESTED THAT HE EXPECTED THE ISSUE TO SPLIT THE HOUSE REPUBLICANS, PITTING THE LEADERSHIP AGAINST THE 87 TEA PARTY-SYMPATHIZING FRESHMEN. The leaders would have to agree to a tax increase in order to get a deal, with a party schism like the one that followed George H.W. Bush's agreement to a tax increase in 1990.

That didn't happen. Instead Reid abandoned his demand for a tax increase. The reason, I think, is that he hasn't had a 50-vote majority for a tax increase in the Senate, just as Senate Democrats haven't been able to pass a budget….

http://washingtonexaminer.com/politics/2011/07/gop-wins-when-fight-over-cuts-not-more-taxes#ixzz1TkHIbCrd

We have another example of absolutely horrid Democratic tactics in congress. We saw it in the Obamacare fight with bribes to Democratic Senators and now we’ve seen it with most of the Democratic posturing designed not to solve the problem, but blame the Republicans.


Winners and Losers

The debt ceiling fight is over. The White House and congressional leaders have settled on a deal to raise the nation’s debt ceiling, enact immediate spending cuts and, our favorite part, create a super-commission designed to trim the federal budget further by the end of the year.

The political stakes for this fight were massive — and it produced a number of winners and losers. OUR TAKE ON THE BEST AND THE WORST IS BELOW.

WINNERS

MITCH MCCONNELL...
THE TEA PARTY...
BHO...
CBO...

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/the-debt-ceiling-deal-winners-and-losers/2011/07/31/gIQAHl7FmI_story.html

Go to the link to read all about it and see who the author declares as losers in the deal.


How the Tea Party won the debt fight

The Tea Party came under fire from all sides Friday after House conservatives nearly brought down Speaker John Boehner’s debt-limit bill. John McCain went to the Senate floor to mock Tea Partyers as “hobbits,” and DEMOCRATIC REP. CHRIS VAN HOLLEN SAID TEA PARTY REPUBLICANS “ARE UNFIT FOR GOVERNING.”

WHAT A DIFFERENCE A WEEKEND MAKES. The reported debt-limit deal appears to be a victory for the Tea Party. It includes AROUND $1 TRILLION IN SPENDING CUTS AND CREATES A SPECIAL COMMITTEE OF CONGRESS TO RECOMMEND CUTS OF $1.2 TRILLION MORE. If Congress does not approve those additional cuts by year’s end, automatic spending cuts go into effect. The package sets an important new precedent that debt-limit increases must be “paid for” with commensurate cuts in spending. According to Sen. Rob Portman, a former White House budget director, IF WE CUT A DOLLAR OF SPENDING FOR EVERY DOLLAR WE RAISE THE DEBT LIMIT, WE WILL BALANCE THE BUDGET IN 10 YEARS — something that even the Paul Ryan budget would not achieve. And all this is accomplished with no tax increases….

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/how-the-tea-party-hobbits-won-the-debt-fight/2011/07/31/gIQALMrCmI_story.html

What a difference a year makes. This time in 2010, the Democrats controlled everything. They had passed Obamacare just 4 months before and although there was unsettling news in the wind, Nancy Pelosi proudly announced the Democrats would retain control of the House. Spending was the word of the day. Today, all that has changed.

Watch the Politics today

Scarborough:  Not a Loser, but Not a Leader

A fascinating bit of gossip from Joe Scarborough, on his MSNBC Morning Joe Show (via rcp, which has video):

Joe Scarborough: "I have got to clear this up. Mika heard two days ago on Capitol Hill democrats all saying the same thing. And that is, THIS PRESIDENT HAS BEEN INVISIBLE, HE IS NOT A LEADER. They said this all behind closed doors. Democratic leaders, democratic rank-and-file. In fact, 40, 50 of the most powerful democrats on the hill. I will just stop right there. The complaints were all the same. THE PRESIDENT HAS VANISHED. He has left us here alone again like he did with health care. Where is he? NOW, THEY DIDN'T CALL HIM A LOSER, BUT THEY SURE AS HELL DIDN'T CALL HIM A LEADER."

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2011/07/they_sure_as_hell_didnt_call_him_a_leader.html

When the team turns on the quarterback, they aren’t likely to win the game.

White House, Republicans Strike Tentative Deal To Raise Debt Ceiling

ABC News' Jonathan Karl reports:

ABC News has learned that REPUBLICANS AND THE WHITE HOUSE HAVE STRUCK A TENTATIVE DEAL TO RAISE THE DEBT CEILING BEFORE THE AUG. 2 DEADLINE. It's not done yet, but here is the framework of the tentative deal they have worked out, according to a source familiar with the negotiations:

DEBT CEILING INCREASE OF UP TO $2.8 TRILLION
SPENDING CUTS OF ROUGHLY $1 TRILLION
• Vote on the Balanced Budget Amendment
SPECIAL COMMITTEE TO RECOMMEND CUTS OF $1.8 TRILLION (or whatever it takes to add up to the total of the debt ceiling increase)
• Committee must make recommendations before Thanksgiving recess
• If Congress does not approve those cuts by late December, AUTOMATIC ACROSS-THE-BOARD CUTS GO INTO EFFECT, INCLUDING CUTS TO DEFENSE AND MEDICARE.

http://blogs.abcnews.com/thenote/2011/07/white-house-republicans-strike-tenative-deal-to-raise-debt-ceiling-.html

A good deal for the Republicans considering the only control ½ of the congress.  And it is also a good deal for the American public. 

You’re going to Pay

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/273214/youre-gonna-pay-jonah-goldberg

A catchy reminder what the debate is all about in Washington.

Common Sense and a Rising Star

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/273203/we-either-save-country-or-we-do-not-and-save-it-we-must-seek-solutions-kathryn-jean-lo

Senator Marco Rubio talks sense to America.

A Congressman’s Gaffe or He Told the Truth?

http://legalinsurrection.com/2011/07/its-not-that-we-dont-trust-you-but/

In one minute you can hear the truth about spending.

Saturday, July 30, 2011

Going down

Gallup: New Low for the President

President Obama's job approval rating is at a new low, averaging 40% in July 26-28 Gallup Daily tracking. His prior low rating of 41% occurred several times, the last of which was in April. As recently as June 7, Obama had 50% job approval.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/148739/Obama-Approval-Drops-New-Low.aspx

Next stop: the thirties!

Obama, the Debt, and How He Lost the 2012 Election

…WHAT OBAMA WANTED WAS A PERSONAL TRIUMPH, a vindication of his status as the American Augustus. A clear road to 2012 with no more budgetary debates and crises. The utter humiliation of the GOP, which would be forced to swallow new taxes, leaving them with one less issue next year. An under-the-table legitimization of his "policies" (I think that's the word I'm groping for), which could then be touted as successes despite the damage they have left behind. THE REESTABLISHMENT OF BARACK OBAMA AS A POLITICAL DEMIGOD. And before we overlook it, another few hundred billion to toss to his political allies.

What has he got? HE'S GOT AS CLEAR A DEFEAT AS ANY PRESIDENT HAS EVER SUFFERED. A PARTY IN TOTAL DISARRAY. A SET OF EMBARRASSED AND ANGRY SUBORDINATES. AN ECONOMIC POLICY THAT'S GOING DOWN FOR THE THIRD TIME. A GOP heading into 2012 with a momentum comparable to that of Patton tearing into the Palatinate. And one final thing: the long-overdue public revelation of a fatally flawed and inadequate personality.

This is where voting "present" brings you at last. He's tried this before, on the occasion of the September 15 financial crash, right in the middle of the 2008 campaign. It will be recalled that John McCain put his campaign on hold and headed for Washington to do what was necessary. Whatever might be thought of McCain, and however good or poor his reasons at the time, it was the act of a man to whom duty was more important than career. And Obama? Well, Obama always comes first, doesn't he? He just turned his back and kept on going. He knew he couldn't lose, whichever way things broke.
He obviously thought the same thing now. But times have changed. People have seen Barack Obama, have taken in his oddities, his narcissism, his ignorance, his lack of quality. They are unwilling to cut him any more slack. They know what a president looks like, good or bad, popular or not, and THEY NO LONGER SEE A PRESIDENT IN BARACK OBAMA. Is it possible to imagine Reagan, FDR, Truman, or either of the Bushes pulling the kind of tricks that Obama has in recent days?...

http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/07/obama_seems_to_be_taking_his_defeat_in_the_2012_election_rather_well.html

If I were a Hillary supporter, I would be really dismayed.

No One Loves a Loser

….MR. OBAMA SEEMED BRILLIANT AT POLITICS WHEN HE FIRST EMERGED IN 2004. He understood the nation's longing for unity. We're not divided into red states and blue, he said, we're Big Purple, we can solve our problems together. FOUR YEARS LATER HE READ THE LAY OF THE LAND PERFECTLY—REALLY, PERFECTLY. The nation and the Democratic Party were tired of the Clinton machine. He came from nowhere and dismantled it. It was breathtaking. He went into the 2008 general election with a miraculously unified party and took down another machine, bundling up all the accrued resentment of eight years with one message: "YOU KNOW THE TWO LOSING WARS AND THE ECONOMIC COLLAPSE WE'VE BEEN DEALING WITH? I WON'T DO THAT. I'M NOT BUSH."

The fact is, HE'S GOOD AT DISMANTLING. HE'S GOOD AT CRITIQUING. He's good at not being the last guy, the one you didn't like. BUT HE'S NOT GOOD AT BUILDING, CREATING, CALLING INTO BEING. HE WAS GOOD AT SUMMONING HOPE, BUT HE'S NOT GOOD AT DIRECTING IT AND TURNING IT INTO SOMETHING CONCRETE THAT ANSWERS A BROAD PUBLIC DESIRE.

And so his failures in the debt ceiling fight. He wasn't serious, he was only shrewd—and shrewdness wasn't enough. He demagogued the issue—no Social Security checks—until he was called out, and then went on the hustings spouting inanities. He left conservatives scratching their heads: They could have made a better, more moving case for the liberal ideal as translated into the modern moment, than he did. HE NEVER OFFERED A PLAN. In a crisis he was merely sly. And no one likes sly, no one respects it.

SO HE IS LOSING A BATTLE IN WHICH HE HAD SUPERIOR FORCES—THE PRESIDENCY, THE U.S. SENATE. In the process he revealed that his foes have given him too much mystique. He is not a devil, an alien, a socialist. 

HE IS A LOSER. AND THIS IS AMERICA, WHERE NOBODY LOVES A LOSER.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111904800304576474620336602248.html

Peggy Noonan again knocks it out of the park.  There's an old saying, "Any jackass can knock down a barn, but it takes a carpenter to build one."  Obama is obviously not a carpenter.



Independents sour on President Obama

President Barack Obama is losing independent voters, a new national poll shows.

A majority of independent voters say they disapprove of Mr. Obama’s handing of his job, and far fewer independents say they would vote to re-elect the president, the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press reported.

In the Pew survey, taken July 20-24, some 54% of independents said they disapproved of Mr. Obama’s job performance, his highest disapproval rating among those voters so far. Some 36% said they approved of the president’s handling of his job.

Some 31% of independents said they would vote to re-elect the president, a drop from 42% in May. Where Mr. Obama in prior Pew surveys had claimed a plurality of independents, the June poll showed him to be losing independents to a generic GOP candidate, 39% to 31%....


While liberals have nowhere else to go but Obama, and conservatives being in the ABO club (anybody but Obama), it is the independents that will decide the election.  And Obama needs a lot of them (conservative make up 40% of the population, liberals 20%) if he wants to win a second term.  It won’t happen.  Obama is no longer the candidate of nonspecific hope and change.  He is the candidate with a record of 9% unemployment, enormous deficits, and divisiveness. 



NYT lets the Cat Out of the Bag

Giddy after the recent legalization of gay marriage in New York, THE EDITORS AT THE NEW YORK TIMES ARE LAYING OUT THE LEFT'S POST-GAY MARRIAGE AGENDA IN THE PAPER'S PAGES FOR ALL TO SEE.

What they clearly want is a country that is sexually unrecognizable from the one we live in today, one WHERE MARITAL INFIDELITY IS ACCEPTED AS A LIFESTYLE CHOICE AND ACTUALLY CELEBRATED, and traditional marriage is legally marginalized and removed from the public square.

Times op-ed columnist Ross Douthat essentially laid out the cultural side of the left's and the Times' post-gay marriage agenda in a July column.

GAY MARRIAGE SUPPORTERS CALLED LIBERATIONISTS "HOPE THAT GAY MARRIAGE WILL HELP KNOCK MARRIAGE OFF ITS CULTURAL PEDESTAL ALTOGETHER," DOUTHAT EXPLAINED.

To liberationists, IF TRADITIONAL MARRIAGE BECOMES THE "GOLD STANDARD" FOR RELATIONSHIPS BOTH GAY AND STRAIGHT, THE GAY MARRIAGE MOVEMENT WILL HAVE "FAILED IN ITS DEEPER MISSION," which he describes as introducing a "greater freedom than can be found in the one-size-fits-all rules of marriage."

The apparent hope is that legalized gay marriages will be more openly sexually promiscuous than straight marriage, providing an example that would then influence heterosexual couples to adopt the same open-marriage lifestyle.

IN A JUNE ARTICLE CALLED "MARRIED, WITH INFIDELITIES," THE TIMES USED GAY ACTIVIST AND COLUMNIST DAN SAVAGE'S OPEN MARRIAGE AS THE NEW MODEL FOR STRAIGHT MARRIAGES that should take root culturally from the legalization of gay marriage….


Well this certainly answers the question of how gay marriage “hurts” traditional marriage.



Atlas Shrugs

I was at a public hearing in an inner-city Birmingham neighborhood for various government officials to get public input on some local environmental issues.

…But RONNIE BRYANT WASN’T THERE TO TALK ABOUT THAT PARTICULAR MINE. As a mine operator in a nearby area, HE WAS ATTENDING THE MEETING TO LISTEN TO WHAT RESIDENTS AND GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS WERE SAYING. He listened to close TO TWO HOURS OF PEOPLE TRASHING COMPANIES OF ALL TYPES AND BLAMING POLLUTION FOR RANDOM CASES OF CANCER IN THEIR FAMILIES. Several speakers clearly believe that all of the cancer and other deaths they see in their families and communities must be caused by pollution. Why? Who knows? Maybe just because it makes for an emotional story to blame big bad business. It’s hard to say.

After Bryant listened to all of the business-bashing, he finally stood to speak. He sounded a little bit shellshocked, a little bit angry — and a lot frustrated.

My name’s Ronnie Bryant, and I’m a mine operator…. I’ve been issued a [state] permit in the recent past for [waste water] discharge, and after standing in this room today listening to the comments being made by the people…. [pause] Nearly every day without fail — I have a different perspective — men stream to these [mining] operations looking for work in Walker County. THEY CAN’T PAY THEIR MORTGAGE. THEY CAN’T PAY THEIR CAR NOTE. THEY CAN’T FEED THEIR FAMILIES. THEY DON’T HAVE HEALTH INSURANCE. And as I stand here today, I just … you know … WHAT’S THE USE? I GOT A PERMIT TO OPEN UP AN UNDERGROUND COAL MINE THAT WOULD EMPLOY PROBABLY 125 PEOPLE. They’d be paid wages from $50,000 to $150,000 a year. We would consume probably $50 million to $60 million in consumables a year, putting more men to work. And my only idea today is to go home. What’s the use? I don’t know. I mean, I see these guys — I see them with tears in their eyes — looking for work. And IF THERE’S SO MUCH OPPOSITION TO THESE GUYS MAKING A LIVING, I FEEL LIKE THERE’S NO NEED IN ME PUTTING OUT THE EFFORT TO PROVIDE WORK FOR THEM. So as I stood against the wall here today, basically what I’VE DECIDED IS NOT TO OPEN THE MINE. I’m just quitting. Thank you.


More stories follow in the link. 



President Obama Is No Longer Tethered To Reality

Image by AFP via @daylife



President Barack Obama’s speech to the nation Monday night was highly disturbing. Because read carefully, it reveals A PRESIDENT WILDLY DIVORCED FROM THE FUNDAMENTAL REALITIES OF THE NATION HE IS SUPPOSED TO BE LEADING.

President Obama actually told America on national television that it is a nation “WITH A SYSTEM IN WHICH THE DECK SEEMS STACKED AGAINST MIDDLE CLASS AMERICANS IN FAVOR OF THE WEALTHIEST FEW.” It is incomprehensible how a man serving as president of these United States could make such a fundamentally false assertion about his own country.

As I explain in my new book, America’s Ticking Bankruptcy Bomb, before Obama was even elected, official IRS data showed that for 2007 THE TOP 1% OF INCOME EARNERS PAID MORE IN FEDERAL INCOME TAXES THAN THE BOTTOM 95% COMBINED. The top 1% paid 40.4% of all federal income taxes that year, almost twice their share of income. THE MIDDLE FIFTH OF INCOME EARNERS, THE ACTUAL MIDDLE CLASS, PAID 4.7% OF FEDERAL INCOME TAXES. Deck stacked against the middle class in favor of the wealthiest few?

Moreover, the BOTTOM 40% OF INCOME EARNERS AS A GROUP PAID NO FEDERAL INCOME taxes that year. They instead received net payments from the IRS equal to 4% of total federal tax revenues. As my book explains, this was actually the result of nearly 30 years of Reaganomics. Today close to 50% of Americans pay no federal income tax….


Reality to most liberals is like a twilight zone where strange things happen that they can’t understand.  And they keep trying to terraform the landscape to something otherworldly.  The problem is what they create eventually is poisonous to the workingmen and women of the country. 











Thursday, July 28, 2011

The self destruction of Barack Obama

Obama Self Destructs

Make no mistake: that's what happened over the past weekend. We have been through a mercilessly condensed version of a presidential campaign, lasting only hours, in which Barack Obama ran against his own image, DEMONSTRATED HIMSELF UNWORTHY OF OFFICE, AND THREW AWAY ANY CHANCE OF VICTORY IN NEXT YEAR'S CONTEST.

To start with, we have his failure to deal with the budget in due time, thus allowing the crisis to build up in the first place. Then we have his walking out of the negotiations after he himself tried to pull a fast one (adding $500 billion -- that's a half-trillion, folks -- in taxes at the last minute). THE THREATS AGAINST GRANDMA'S CHECKS. HIS PETULANT AND ADOLESCENT FRIDAY PRESS CONFERENCE. HIS PROLONGED WEEKEND SULK, LEAVING THE SEPARATE HOUSES OF CONGRESS TO WORK THEIR WAY THROUGH THE CRISIS WITH NO INPUT FROM THE WHITE HOUSE WHATSOEVER. HIS WORDLESS REJECTION OF A BETTER DEAL THAN HE HAD COMING. THE ATTEMPT TO CRASH THE ASIAN MARKETS BY PERSONAL DECREE. AND FINALLY THE SPEECH WHICH WAS INTENDED TO RALLY THE COUNTRY BEHIND HIS VISION BUT WOUND UP AS A PROLONGED PLEA FOR CONGRESS AND THE TEA PARTIES TO STOP PICKING ON HIM.

How can this be described as anything else but a complete dereliction of his duty as chief executive of this country? Put aside all else that has occurred over the past two years; last weekend we saw the utter disintegration of a president. It cannot be overlooked, and it will not be forgotten….

http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/07/obama_seems_to_be_taking_his_defeat_in_the_2012_election_rather_well.html

Obama is a disaster and as the going gets tough, we are watching him self destruct.

Millennials Move to the GOP

…But there has been big movement among whites. In 2008 they were 51 to 40 percent Republican. In the first half of 2011 they were

56 to 35 percent Republican -- more Republican than Southern whites were three years ago.
The most noteworthy movement among whites has been among voters under 30, the so-called Millennial generation. Millennials voted 66 to 32 percent for Barack Obama in 2008 and identified as Democrats rather than Republicans by a 60 to 32 percent margin.

But WHITE MILLENNIALS HAVE BEEN MOVING AWAY FROM THE DEMOCRATS. The DEMOCRATIC EDGE IN PARTY IDENTIFICATION AMONG WHITE MILLENNIALS DROPPED FROM 7 POINTS IN 2008 TO 3 POINTS IN 2009 TO A 1-POINT REPUBLICAN EDGE IN 2010 AND AN 11-POINT REPUBLICAN LEAD IN 2011….

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2011/07/28/under_obama_millennials_move_into_the_gop_column_110740.html

If it wasn’t for bad luck, the Democrats would have no luck at all when it comes to the 2012 elections.

The Ever Increasing Reach of Government

According to the Food and Drug Administration, that is precisely where you should find them. Because Diamond Foods made truthful claims about the health benefits of consuming walnuts that the FDA didn't approve, it sent the company a letter declaring, "Your walnut products are drugs" -- and "new drugs" at that -- and, therefore, "they may not legally be marketed ... in the United States without an approved new drug application." The agency even threatened Diamond with "seizure" if it failed to comply.

http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/health-care/8294-walnuts-are-drugs-says-fda

Using this example, does that mean that PETA are medical specialists who need to be approved by the AMA?

Soros: Hypocrite or Simply a Democrat Crony

Prominent Republican Senator Richard Shelby accused billionaire investor George Soros of hypocrisy on Wednesday for EVADING NEW HEDGE FUND REGULATIONS HE ONCE PUBLICLY BACKED.

SOROS RECENTLY SAID HE WOULD RETURN MONEY TO OUTSIDER INVESTORS AND ONLY MANAGE HIS OWN FAMILY'S FUNDS TO ESCAPE THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION'S NEW HEDGE FUND ADVISER REGISTRATION RULES.

"It appears that Mr. Soros talked up financial reform only to sell it short," Shelby told Reuters in a statement. "Don't be surprised to see his fellow Wall Street financiers follow suit. They'll use their political clout and legal muscle to sidestep Dodd-Frank, while their smaller competitors and businesses take the hit."

By giving back investors' money -- which is a small slice of the roughly $25 billion Soros oversees -- SOROS IS TAKING ADVANTAGE OF AN EXEMPTION IN A RECENTLY APPROVED SEC RULE REQUIRED BY THE DODD-FRANK ACT.

The exemption allows family offices not only to avoid the registration requirements, but also to dodge a greater disclosure burden that requires big fund managers to turn over confidential data to help the SEC police systemic risk.

http://news.yahoo.com/senator-shelby-says-soros-hypocrite-reforms-dodge-041709270.html#ixzz1TSfmJ9DF

You don’t get as rich as he is without a lot of hypocrisy.

America's first Climate Debate

So, when do you think America’s first climate debate took place, and who were the participants? Here is a hint:

As the tumultuous century was drawing to a close, the conservative Yale grad challenged the sitting vice president’s ideas about global warming. The vice president, a cerebral Southerner, was planning his own run for the presidency, and the fiery Connecticut native was eager to denounce the opposition party.

The answer is not Al Gore and George W. Bush, but Thomas Jefferson and Noah Webster.

http://judithcurry.com/2011/07/26/americas-first-global-warming-debate/#more-4181

Debt Plans reviewed

Ten things that happen if the Boehner bill gets through

We know what happens if the Boehner bill fails in the House. There is no alternative plan. We suffer whatever shock to the U.S. and world economies that will follow a default. The president will go to the country, claiming the Republicans endangered the country’s economy and global standing. But what happens if the House passes the Boehner bill?

1. The Boehner bill becomes the inevitable solution to the crisis. As Keith Hennessey explains, WE ALSO MAKE PROGRESS IN RESTORING FISCAL SANITY:….

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/post/ten-things-that-happen-if-the-boehner-bill-gets-through/2011/03/29/gIQA1nLLdI_blog.html

Here’s a must read. It explains what is in the Boehner bill and the political ramifications.

Dem lawmaker: 'Nobody I know' has seen Reid plan

A House Democrat indicated Wednesday that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) might not have party members' votes locked down for his deficit proposal.

"I'M NOT GOING TO COMMIT TO SOMETHING THAT NOBODY I KNOW HAS SEEN AND HAD A CHANCE TO ANALYZE," Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-Ore.) said. "I want to see it."

Speaker John Boehner's (R-Ohio) deficit proposal was met with division within his party on Monday, resulting in speculation that Boehner's two-step plan does not have enough Republican support to pass the House, much less the Senate, where REID SAID BOEHNER'S PLAN WOULD BE "DEAD ON ARRIVAL."

But Blumenauer said that few Democrats have had a chance to sign onto Reid's alternative measure. "I had dinner with one of my friends who is a senator last night, who was saying they're really interested in seeing the details," he said on CSPAN's "Washington Journal" program. "They haven't seen the details yet."…

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/173819-dem-lawmaker-nobody-i-know-has-seen-reid-plan?utm_campaign=briefingroom&utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitterfeed

It seems the Democratic leadership like bills that no one has read.

Meanwhile there is no White House Plan

The day after White House press secretary Jay Carney and Fox News reporter Ed Henry tangled over Henry's request for specifics on Obama's plan on debt limit and deficit reduction, Carney and Henry were back at it again on Wednesday.

HENRY ASKED AT THE BRIEFING WHEN OBAMA'S PLAN MIGHT BE SUBMITTED TO THE CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE.

"Ed, I understand, we can do this again, OK?" Carney said. "Has the speaker of the House shown you the positions he took in detail in the negotiations that were designed actually to achieve a compromise, as opposed to having a show vote?"

"WE PUT FORWARD A BUDGET, WE PUT FORWARD A FRAMEWORK," CARNEY SAID….

http://www.politico.com/politico44/perm/0711/a_thing_for_fox_f74f5ad3-fc03-4d15-854c-d5ddeda3967c.html

And here is the real tragedy. While both the House and the Senate have a plan, the White House has only “a framework.” As for the comment about the budget, it was defeated in the Senate 97-0. There is no leadership from this administration. None at all.

What Is The Path To Hell Paved With?

FOR 16 YEARS PRIOR TO 2009, THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TRIED TO BOOST HOME OWNERSHIP RATES AMONG MINORITIES AND IMMIGRANTS. Instead, it managed to cut in half the median value of real estate equity held by Hispanic homeowners.

THE MEDIAN VALUE OF HISPANIC-OWNED HOMES FELL FROM NEARLY $100,000 IN 2005 TO BARELY $49,000 BY 2009, according to a new report from the Pew Research Center. Meanwhile, Hispanics’ home ownership rate returned to the 1999 level.

The massive financial impact on Hispanics was even greater than the impact on blacks, whose median home equity declined by one-fifth to $59,000. Median home-equity among whites also declined by one-fifth, down to $95,000….

http://dailycaller.com/2011/07/27/wealth-killing-federal-home-ownership-policy/#ixzz1TJKZV8nu

If you look at the debt and government spending you see a pattern of good intentions run amok.

Democrat accuses Republicans of acting like dictators

Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.), chair of the Democratic National Committee, said Wednesday that HOUSE REPUBLICANS ARE TRYING TO IMPOSE “DICTATORSHIP” THROUGH THEIR TACTICS IN THE DEBT-CEILING NEGOTIATIONS. She said the GOP rhetoric could “spark panic and chaos,” which she called “potentially devastating” to the economy.
The chair telephoned POLITICO to express “significant disappointment in where … Republicans have allowed this debate to degenerate.”Aren’t we at the point where the closer we get to chaos, the more concern that there should be about coming to the table and compromising with Democrats?”

Wasserman Schultz asked. “THIS IS NOT LEADERSHIP. THIS IS ALMOST LIKE DICTATORSHIP. I KNOW THEY WANT TO FORCE THE OUTCOME THAT … THEIR EXTREMISTS WOULD LIKE TO IMPOSE. But they are getting ready to spark panic and chaos, and they seem to be OK with that. And it’s just really disappointing, and potentially devastating.”…

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0711/60080.html#ixzz1TOXlDFSf

Once again you have an example of projection. I guess “little Debbie” has forgotten what the Obamacare debate was like
.
Do High Taxes Hurt Growth?

HIGH TAXES ARE BAD FOR CITIES. Low taxes encourage growth. In fact, between 1980 and 2007, compared to the ten most-taxed metropolitan areas, AMERICA'S TEN LEAST-TAXED METROPOLITAN AREAS EXPERIENCED THREE TIMES FASTER POPULATION GROWTH, 2.7 TIMES FASTER EMPLOYMENT GROWTH, AND TWICE AS GREAT AN INCREASE IN PERSONAL INCOME. In the latest Cato Journal, economist Dean Stansel observes:

If high-tax, low-growth metro areas like Detroit, Milwaukee, Buffalo, and Syracuse want to be more like high-growth areas such as Dallas, Tampa, San Antonio, and Austin, they should lower their onerous burden of taxation and bring spending under control….

http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/07/progressives_and_their_taxes_kill_cities.html

The left keeps saying taxes don’t hurt growth. The facts say otherwise.

Climate Science and Democracy

Archimedes supposedly said, GIVE ME A LONG ENOUGH LEVER AND I CAN MOVE THE WORLD. THE POST-NORMAL SCIENTISTS THINK THAT SCIENCE IS A LEVER THAT CAN BE USED TO RULE THE WORLD.

Certain important climate scientists are very eager to reorganize society. THEY PROCLAIM, ON WEAK EVIDENCE, THAT THE EARTH IS DOOMED BY GLOBAL WARMING UNLESS WE FOLLOW A GREEN PLAN TO REMAKE THE ECONOMY AND THE SOCIAL ORDER. We have to give up cars for trolleys. Windmills will become ubiquitous. The most famous climate scientist, JAMES HANSEN, WANTS TO PUT HIS OPPONENTS ON TRIAL FOR CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY. Implicit in all this is the idea that a central committee of Dr. Strangeloves should rule the world. Instead of prince this and duke that, we will have doctor this and doctor that. THESE RADICAL INTELLECTUALS SECRETLY DESPISE THE PRESENT SYSTEM OF RULE BY THE RABBLE, OTHERWISE KNOWN AS DEMOCRACY. …

http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/07/climate_witchcraft_and_post_normal_science.html

That last statement sums up what Progressivism is all about. They want to rule the “rabble” in a benevolent way, but democracy is not highly prized. Look at the major argument of the AGW crowd. “The debate is over, we have consensus.” Not only is this a lie, but it is anti-democratic and anti-science.

Wednesday, July 27, 2011

The Mask Slips

Our Petulant and Inept President

The negotiations about raising the debt ceiling remain extremely fluid, and it’s still too early to draw any definitive conclusions at this stage. But just a week away from the August 2 deadline, a few things do seem clear.

The first is THE PRESIDENT’S ANGRY AND NARCISSISTIC PRESS CONFERENCE ON FRIDAY BADLY DAMAGED THE PRESIDENT, even with those, like David Brooks, who have been sympathetic to Obama’s substantive position.

It’s been clear to some of us for a while that Barack Obama is a man of uncommon self-admiration, quite thin-skinned, and increasingly consumed by his grievances. Obama has masked these traits pretty well so far, but ON FRIDAY HIS MASK SLIPPED MORE THAN IT EVER HAS. AND THAT IS BOUND TO HURT HIM.

Second, DEMOCRATS ON CAPITOL HILL ARE RAPIDLY LOSING CONFIDENCE IN THE PRESIDENT’S COMPETENCE AS A NEGOTIATOR. Obama’s conduct during the debt ceiling negotiations – FROM HIS FLIP-FLOPS TO HIS IRRELEVANT DEADLINES TO HIS BACKTRACKING ON HIS AGREEMENTS WITH VARIOUS PARTIES – has been so erratic and uneven that his own party has decided the best hope of reaching an agreement is to sideline him….

http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2011/07/25/our-petulant-and-inept-president/

Obama’s fate is pretty well sealed long before the 2012 election. He will join Bush 41 and Jimmy Carter as the third most recent one term president.

Bill Kristol: Obama talks down to Americans

I was struck by these sentences in President Obama’s speech:

Now, what makes today’s stalemate so dangerous is that it has been tied to something known as the debt ceiling – a term that most people outside of Washington have probably never heard of before.
Understand – RAISING THE DEBT CEILING DOES NOT ALLOW CONGRESS TO SPEND MORE MONEY. IT SIMPLY GIVES OUR COUNTRY THE ABILITY TO PAY THE BILLS THAT CONGRESS HAS ALREADY RACKED UP.

Consider the condescension implicit in the president’s statement—“a term that most people outside of Washington have probably never heard of before.” These “people outside of Washington” are not little children being lectured on an obscure subject by a worldly adult.

http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/baby-talk_577584.html

Actually this wasn’t just condensing, it was a lie. The country does have enough money to pay the bills it has already racked up. What it doesn’t have is enough money to continue to spend at the current level. That’s what the Republicans are saying and demanding. We must cut spending.

Jimmy Carter’s smiling

Which is to say, it’s a pathetic joke:

The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs’ PRONOUNCEMENT TODAY THAT LIBYA IS A “STALEMATE” would, I think, have gotten a bit more attention but for the debt debate.
We recently passed the four-month anniversary of “Operation Odyssey Dawn,” the U.S.-led air assault on Moammar Qaddafi’s regime. NOW, 128 DAYS LATER, WE’VE GOT A “STALEMATE.”

JUST AS THEY DON’T TEACH ECONOMICS AT HARVARD LAW, I GUESS THEY DON’T TEACH MILITARY HISTORY THERE, EITHER. So we pissed away hundreds of billions in neo-Keynesian “stimulus” spending without creating a recovery, and now we’ve wasted hundreds of millions in bombs and missiles without defeating the enemy — who, it’s worth pointing out, posed no threat to the U.S. or its allies.

You know who’s smiling now? Jimmy Carter.

http://theothermccain.com/2011/07/25/obamas-foreign-policy-is-about-as-successful-as-obamas-domestic-policy/

Is it time to give back that Peace Prize? Just asking.

Are You Better Off Today Than Jan. 20, 2009?

A SLIM 15% CLAIM TO BE "GETTING AHEAD FINANCIALLY," half what it was in 2006. Fully 27% say they're falling behind financially. That's up 6 points since February.

A SIGNIFICANT MAJORITY (54%) SAYS THEY'VE BEEN FORCED TO CHANGE THEIR LIFESTYLE SIGNIFICANTLY as a result of the economic times -- and 60% of them are angry, up from 44%.

To be sure, 30 months after he returned to home cooking, George W. Bush still gets majority blame for the economy.

But here's the breaking news for hopeful Democrats: George W. Bush isn't running for anything except exercise.

"MORE THAN A THIRD OF AMERICANS NOW BELIEVE THAT PRESIDENT OBAMA’S POLICIES ARE HURTING THE ECONOMY, AND CONFIDENCE IN HIS ABILITY TO CREATE JOBS IS SHARPLY ERODING AMONG HIS BASE," the Post reports….
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2011/07/obama-poll-jobs-democratic-base-crumbling.html

These are the kinds of facts that make Obama’s reelection chances slip from slim to none.


We Need Tectonic Changes…

What has long been clear to many constitutional scholars is now intuitively obvious to Americans of all stripes: THE RELENTLESS EXPANSION OF FEDERAL POWER IS DESTROYING SELF-GOVERNMENT AT EVERY LEVEL OF SOCIETY BESIDES THE NATIONAL ONE — and with it, the self-reliance and independence that made this country great. It is difficult any longer to see what stands between us and a statist tyranny of the majority. Supporters of the balanced-budget amendment are trying to erect a shield against unrestrained federal power. Conservative skeptics should to do more than say, “Well, that won’t work.”

As Arthur Brooks writes in an instant classic on what’s really at stake in the debt-ceiling talks, “WE NEED TECTONIC CHANGES, NOT MINOR FIDDLING.” If not a constitutional amendment, then what? Arthur Brooks’s column is a call to action — “hard work for at least a decade.” But what exactly is our objective, if not TO REVIVE CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTIONS AGAINST THE VAST ACCUMULATION OF CENTRAL GOVERNMENT POWER THAT THE FRAMERS EQUATED WITH TYRANNY, and which Brooks terms “statism” and “the welfare state”? Brooks supports Rep. Paul Ryan’s plan — but it would require supreme political will to carry that plan through, and as soon as we let our guard down, we’d be right back where we are now. That’s because tectonic changes over the past 70 years have taken us away from a Constitution of limited powers and toward a dynamic of unlimited federal expansion

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/272703/we-need-tectonic-changes-mario-loyola

Liberals look at the world as one of scarcity. Conservatives look at it as one of opportunity. Liberals trust the Government. Conservatives trust individuals.

Boehner’s Explains It All To You

House Speaker John Boehner (R., Ohio) followed President Obama’s speech Monday evening with one of his one, in which HE IMPLORED WASHINGTON TO GET SERIOUS ABOUT ITS SPENDING PROBLEM. “IN WASHINGTON MORE SPENDING AND MORE DEBT IS BUSINESS AS USUAL,” HE SAID. “I’VE GOT NEWS FOR WASHINTON — THOSE DAYS ARE OVER.”

President Obama is not merely asking for another routine debt increase, the speaker explained, but rather “THE LARGEST DEBT INCREASE IN AMERICAN HISTORY, ON THE HEELS OF THE LARGEST SPENDING BINGE IN AMERICAN HISTORY,” which yielded nothing apart from an unpopular, unsustainable new health-care law, a failed $1 trillion stimulus package, and a skyrocketing deficit and debt.

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/272705/boehners-rebuttal-andrew-stiles

I see a lot of Democrats whine that the Republicans lifted the Debt Limit 8 times during Bush’s presidency without any arguments. It’s time to turn that around on them. It appears Obama doesn’t want to discuss this during an election year and had the last debt ceiling increase run so it wouldn’t be an issue in 2010 and wants to do the same thing for 2012. We know what he’s afraid of.

Another Reason Obama Will Lose in 2012

PRESIDENT OBAMA IS GOING TO LOSE HIS BID FOR RE-ELECTION. Not just because of the anemic recovery, stubborn unemployment, runaway spending, staggering deficits, lack of public faith in his ability as commander-in-chief, his hostility towards Israel's government, the rise of the Tea Party, or the Republican-favoring implications of redistricting on the electoral map. Those are all factors, and the coming months will provide endless columns discussing each. (Of this I am sure, for I intend to write some of them.)

But there is a more fundamental reason he'll lose: Barack Obama, once perceived as extraordinary, now just seems extra-ordinary. HE HAS GOTTEN POLITICALLY BORING. AND AMERICA DOES NOT RE-ELECT BORING PRESIDENTS.

Obama isn't boring in the same conventional, square, policy-wonk manner of so many other politicians; he still acts cool, plays basketball, and parties with Hollywood's A-list. But as a president he has become boring: HE IS TIRESOME, UNPERSUASIVE, DIVISIVE, REPETITIVE, PREDICTABLE, AND CYNICAL -- IMPORTANTLY, THE OPPOSITE OF EVERYTHING ADVERTISED HIMSELF TO BE….

http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/07/obama_the_bore.html

Obama has gone from soaring to boring. When was the last time you thought one of his speeches was really extraordinary?

Math comes to Washington

Do you feel it?

The tempo has changed and well understood rules no longer seem to apply to anything any longer. JUST A FEW MONTHS AGO, ALL WE HEARD WAS THE RUSH TO SPEND MONEY. TARP, STIMULUS, BAILOUTS, OBAMACARE...ALL MULTI BILLION DOLLAR EXPENSES.

It's funny how THE COLD BREATH OF THE LAWS OF MATHEMATICS CHANGES EVERYTHING. THE LAWS OF MATHEMATICS AND ECONOMICS ARE THE LIBERALS' HANGMAN'S NOOSE, focusing their mind on survival of Big Government. Change is in the air, and many people now can sense that there is a seismic shift in the established order of things.

http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/07/winds_of_change.html

This article is well worth reading. It covers the economy, consumer debt, energy costs, unemployment, housing and my favorite, Peak Government (I loved this because the libs are always talking about peak oil).

Wisconsin: Unions are good for the employees who are left

Emily Koczela had been anxiously waiting for months for Wisconsin governor Scott Walker’s controversial budget repair bill to take effect. Koczela, the finance director for the Brown Deer school district, had been negotiating with the local union, trying to get it to accept concessions in order to make up for a $1 million budget shortfall. But the union wouldn’t budge.

“We laid off 27 [teachers] as a precautionary measure,” Koczela told me. “They were crying. Some of these people are my friends.”

On June 29 at 12:01 a.m., Koczela could finally breathe a sigh of relief. The budget repair bill—delayed for months by protests, runaway state senators, and a legal challenge that made its way to the state’s supreme court—was law. The 27 teachers on the chopping block were spared….

http://www.weeklystandard.com/articles/walker-s-vindication_577310.html?nopager=1

I watch as unions drove manufacturers out of my home town into non-union cities in the South. Unions are good for the employees who survive, but not so good if you don’t have a lot of seniority.


7 Lessons for Liberals
IT'S NO SECRET THAT LIBERALS AND CONSERVATIVES DON'T GET ALONG. But, if there's any one thing that we've learned from the liberal love of sensitivity classes and situation comedies, it's that once people get to know each other and learn about each other's beliefs and concerns, all legitimate differences melt away. So, with that in mind, I'd like to relieve the concerns of our liberal pals by telling them what we conservatives are really like. Think of it as sensitivity class – for liberals….
….1) I DON'T HATE BLACK AMERICANS, HISPANIC AMERICANS, GAY AMERICANS, JEWISH AMERICANS, MUSLIMS, OR ANY OF THE OTHER GROUPS THAT LIBERALS OBSESSIVELY CLAIM THAT CONSERVATIVES HATE. In all fairness, you could probably make a great case that I strongly dislike Nazis, Satanists, Fred Phelps’ clan full of weirdos, and Noam Chomsky, but who doesn't?...
http://townhall.com/columnists/johnhawkins/2011/07/26/7_promises_i_make_to_liberals
Liberals seem to have replaced critical thinking with critical name calling. Devoid of ideas, they try to build themselves up, by tearing conservatives down.

Tuesday, July 26, 2011

Who does Obama reminds us of from history?

Who would I compare President Obama with in history?

As a history buff, I frequently look to history to try to find example and analogies the help to explain or give insight into what is happening in current events. PRESIDENT OBAMA HAS BEEN A DIFFICULT PERSON TO PAIR UP WITH SOMEONE IN HISTORY.

I THOUGHT OF CALIGULA, not for the debauchery or the insanity that follows him through history, but FOR THE HIGH EXPECTATIONS AND JOY WHEN HE WAS EVALUATED TO THE PRINCIPE. He was so different from Tiberius, who although a good enough emperor, was disliked by the people of Rome as a tightwad. Caligula came into office and like Obama went on a spending spree that exhausted the Treasury of the Empire. Also, Caligula lasted about four years, which I see as the maximum Obama will have in his office.

But this weekend I was watching a documentary on Hawaii. In it they explained how Europeans found Hawaii by chance. WHEN HE ARRIVED CAPTAIN COOK WAS GREETED AS A GOD (which he made no attempt to refute), his arrival happening in the time and manner of a legendary return of a Polynesian god. They stayed there and replenished for about three weeks and then set sail again. He ran into huge storms and had to turn back to Hawaii to repairs. But THIS TIME, THE NATIVES DID NOT GREET HIM AS A GOD SINCE A GOD SHOULD BE ABLE TO CALM THE STORMS. When he came back the natives look with distrust on him and his men and during one engagement Cook was killed.

OBAMA’S POLITICAL LIFE LOOKS MUCH LIKE COOKS ACTUAL LIFE. Obama was greeted by many with wild enthusiasm and sky high expectations. One magazine called him a god and Woody Allen suggested we let him rule as a dictator for a while.

But OBAMA HAS GONE OUT INTO THE ECONOMIC STORMS AND HAS COME BACK WITH HIS SHIP IN SHAMBLES. And the people who looked upon him as their savior are joining those who never fell under his spell. Obama’s problem of not really having any real executive experience was magnified by the expectations the press gave to us of him. His statements the “WE ARE THE ONES WE’VE BEEN WAITING FOR…” and “THIS WAS THE MOMENT WHEN “THE RISE OF THE OCEANS BEGAN TO SLOW AND OUR PLANET BEGAN TO HEAL” speaking of his nomination as the Democratic nominee also did not help him as reality brought him back to earth. And today we look at someone blindly flaying at his political opponents trying to emulate a much more polished Bill Clinton in a different time with a different economy. In a way it is sad. Obama’s name will go down in the history books but not as he had hoped. He will not be remember for marking the day the oceans rise began to slow and the planet began to heal. HE WILL BE REMEMBERED AS A FAILED PRESIDENT WHO GOT TOO MUCH, TOO SOON AND DIDN’T KNOW HOW TO GOVERN.


The Tea Party was right

….STIMULUS. OPPOSITION TO OBAMA'S STIMULUS WAS THE ORIGIN OF THE TEA PARTY. Now we know the story.

How the stimulus was sold: IT WOULD CREATE THREE MILLION JOBS OR MORE. It would keep the unemployment rate under 8%, instead of 9% without a stimulus. It would cost $787B. The jobs were shovel-ready.

What really happened: THERE ARE 1.2 MILLION FEWER JOBS NOW THAN WHEN THE STIMULUS WAS PASSED. Unemployment went over 10% (vs. prediction of 8%) and is STILL OVER 9% (VS. PREDICTION OF ABOUT 6.8% AT THIS TIME). It cost $814B or more. Maybe 6% of it went to infrastructure projects. Obama's reaction? A little joke: "Shovel ready was not as shovel ready as we expected."

Of course, Obama and his minions simply blame this on their underestimating the size of the mess they inherited from Bush. But that has been studied by economists at the University of Western Ontario and Ohio State University. THE VERDICT: THE STIMULUS ITSELF COST ABOUT ONE MILLION PRIVATE-SECTOR JOBS; THE NET JOB LOSS WAS ABOUT 595,000. We'd have been better off without any "stimulus" at all, just as the Tea Party said….

http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/07/the_tea_party_right_about_everything.html

The TEA Party patriots saw what was coming. Made fun of the MSM with reporters asking demonstrators, didn’t the know they were getting tax cuts or made to look that this was nothing but racism, the TEA Party knew that the consequences of the kind of spending Obama did would result in tax increases, government waste, and no real help for the economy. In fact this article documents the loss of almost 600,000 jobs as a result of the stimulus.

Default—What Both Sides Are Thinking

WHAT TOP DEMS ARE THINKING, per an official familiar with the negotiations: “1. A short-term extension would create tremendous uncertainty in the economy and risk a downgrade. No short-term extension can pass the Senate, so any proposal like that is dead on Day 1. Both Cantor and Boehner opposed short term extensions last week. 2. SENATE DEMS AND THE WHITE HOUSE HAVE BENT OVER BACKWARDS TO GIVE THE SPEAKER A WAY OUT OF THE MESS HE CREATED ON FRIDAY BY BLOWING UP WHAT WOULD HAVE BEEN A GOOD DEAL, BUT HE CAN'T BRING HIMSELF TO SAY ‘YES’ TO ANYTHING. 3. The GOP doesn't only oppose all Dem plans -- they oppose their own plans. They are playing a dangerous game of chicken with the economy to appease the fair right of their caucus. 4. If Boehner would just lead his caucus, this would have been over on Saturday. … Boehner has a few hours left to avert a standoff.”

WHAT TOP REPUBLICANS ARE THINKING, per a House leadership aide: “PRESIDENT OBAMA BLEW UP ANY CHANCE OF A BIGGER AGREEMENT WITH HIS INSISTENCE ON TAX HIKES AND BY BACKING AWAY FROM SOME OF THE SERIOUS STRUCTURAL ENTITLEMENT REFORMS HE AGREED TO RHETORICALLY. HE HAS ONLY HIMSELF TO BLAME. The President desperately wants a large debt limit increase that will take him past the next presidential election. Republicans will not give him a $2.4 trillion blank check he can use throughout his re-election campaign to continue the spending binge that has driven our nation to the brink of a job-destroying downgrade and default.

“He is trying to set up a no-win situation for taxpayers: either he gets his $2.4 trillion blank check, or America defaults. Republicans will put forward a responsible, common-sense proposal that reflects the principles of Cut, Cap and Balance and which can pass both chambers. As the deadline approaches it would be inexcusable and indefensible for the President to veto a plan that preserves the full faith and credit of the United States simply because it's inconvenient to his re-election campaign.”

http://www.politico.com/playbook

It appears that both sides are busy trying to blame the other side rather than solve the problem. As I pointed out yesterday, they really have plenty of time to handle the situation due to the Social Security part of the debt, but this doesn’t work for the Democrats and Obama.

Monday, July 25, 2011

The Truth about Default

Poll GOP More Trusted on Economy

REPUBLICANS HAVE GAINED A 10 POINT LEAD OVER DEMOCRATS IN RASMUSSEN REPORTS LATEST NATIONAL SURVEY ON WHO THE PUBLIC MOST TRUSTS TO DEAL EFFECTIVELY WITH ECONOMIC ISSUES.

The 10 point lead is the widest margin held by either party in months and has opened up in recent weeks as President Obama and House Speaker John Boehner have become the central players in the debate over how to deal with the approaching debt-ceiling crisis.

"The gap was the closest in years in May when the GOP held just a 46% to 42% lead on the economy, which voters have consistently regarded as the most important of 10 issues regularly tracked by Rasmussen Reports," the pollster said.

"VOTERS NOW TRUST REPUBLICANS MORE THAN DEMOCRATS ON NINE OF THOSE 10 ISSUES. In May, Republicans led on just six issues after being trusted more on all 10 in early January. Two years ago Democrats were trusted more than Republicans on most issues. Still, there are several issues that the parties are close on in terms of trust.


http://washingtonexaminer.com/blogs/beltway-confidential/2011/07/gop-has-10-point-edge-democrats-public-trust-economic-issues#ixzz1T7ALm0tg

Hmmm, unemployment at 9.2% and rising, debt going up at over $100 billion per MONTH! And you wonder why the Republicans are more trusted?

Obama Fears Reelection Problems More Than Default

PRESIDENT OBAMA, FEARING LOSING REELECTION MORE THAN DEFAULT, THREATENS TO VETO ANY LAST-MINUTE DEBT PACKAGE FROM CONGRESS unless it extends the nation’s borrowing limit beyond the 2012 elections.

Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner told ABC’s “This Week” that Obama demands that any agreement to increase the debt ceiling extend beyond the 2012 elections.

Obama’s chief of staff, Bill Daley, confirmed the veto threat. Daley was asked on NBC’s “Meet the Press” if Obama would veto a plan that doesn’t extend the limit into 2013. Daley answered, “Yes.”
SO A STUBBORN PRESIDENT OBAMA IS WILLING TO VETO WHAT BY ALL ACCOUNTS IS THE GOING TO BE THE ONLY VIABLE OPTION TO MEET HIS ADMINISTRATION’S AUGUST 2 DEADLINE FOR AVOIDING DEFAULT SO HE DOESN’T HAVE TO DEBATE THE ISSUE DURING HIS REELECTION CAMPAIGN.

http://www.redstate.com/california_yankee/2011/07/24/obama-fears-losing-reelection-more-than-default/

Rather than a smart and shrewd politician, how stupid is this man. If he thinks the debt would hurt him in his reelection bid, just think about how a veto and default would hurt.


Obama lies about Social Security

This Friday night press conference, for the second time, President Obama raised the specter that Social Security checks might not go out if Congress does not raise the debt ceiling. ….

....He must not be consulting with his lawyers, because this attempt to scare Social Security recipients is without legal foundation.

As recently explained in much more detail by legal scholars Mark Scarberry and Nancy Altman, and by the aptly-named Thomas Saving, a former public trustee of the Social Security and Medicare Trust Funds, in an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal,  REACHING THE DEBT CEILING WILL NOT AFFECT THE ABILITY OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION TO PAY ITS OBLIGATIONS.

THE SOCIAL SECURITY TRUST FUND HOLDS ABOUT $2.4 TRILLION IN U.S. TREASURY BONDS, which its trustees are legally entitled to redeem whenever Social Security is running a current account deficit. Thus, if we reach the debt ceiling (which I continue to think is a remote prospect, even if less remote than it seemed a week ago), this is what will happen. THE SOCIAL SECURITY TRUST FUND WILL GO TO TREASURY AND CASH IN SOME OF ITS SECURITIES, USING THE PROCEEDS TO SEND CHECKS TO RECIPIENTS. EACH DOLLAR OF DEBT THAT IS REDEEMED WILL LOWER THE OUTSTANDING PUBLIC DEBT BY A DOLLAR. THAT ENABLES THE TREASURY TO BORROW ANOTHER DOLLAR, WITHOUT VIOLATING THE DEBT CEILING. The debt ceiling is not a prohibition on borrowing new money; it is a prohibition on increasing the total level of public indebtedness. If Social Security cashes in some of its bonds, the Treasury can borrow that same amount of money from someone else.

http://pajamasmedia.com/tatler/2011/07/23/contrary-to-obamas-scare-tactics-social-security-checks-are-not-at-risk/

In fact, with $2.4 trillion in Government securities, there is no default crisis. The government could pay all their SS obligations and borrow that amount back to pay for everything else.

O’Keefe unveils 4th Medicaid sting video

This is the fourth installment of James O’Keefe’s Medicaid sting and there is no end in sight. This one takes place in Virginia, and as we saw in Ohio, the Carolinas, and NYC THE MEDICAID WORKERS THERE ARE MORE THAN WILLING TO HELP WEALTHY CRIMINALS GRAB A HUNK OF GOVERNMENT CHEESE.

As always, this is a must-watch that will leave you shaking your head in disbelief. BY NOW I AM CONVINCED IT IS DARN-NEAR IMPOSSIBLE TO ACTUALLY GET TURNED AWAY FOR ANY REASON WHEN WALKING INTO A MEDICAID OFFICE. You could say “I have a stack of corpses in my basement; will that be a problem?” and they’d probably just tell you not to put that on the application.

Still waiting for the media to show an ounce of interest in any of this.

http://www.therightscoop.com/okeefe-unveils-4th-medicaid-sting-video/

I wouldn’t hold my breath about the media’s interest in this. After all it shows a woeful response from government and the media is in bed with the left in calling for more and more government. These video Medicaid employees to by either bumbling fools or conspirators in defrauding the taxpayers.

Saturday, July 23, 2011

The flim-flam man

The worst President ever?

While the debt ceiling dance continues in Washington D.C. and the Republicans in the Senate are going wobbly, they need to understand they are dealing not only with an intransigent party in the White House but also someone that is the most incompetent president in modern history, and the worst steward of the American economy since the nation's founding.

THE OBAMA SYCOPHANTS OFTEN RESORT TO THE WHITE HOUSE PRE-PACKAGED LINE THAT OBAMA INHERITED THE WORST ECONOMY SINCE THE GREAT DEPRESSION, as a means of deflecting responsibility onto George Bush. Like so many of the emanations from this administration that too is a fabrication. As side-by-side comparison of circumstances inherited by Reagan and Obama is as follows:






…. The other Obama failures: UNEMPLOYMENT WAS AT 7.6%, TODAY 9.2% (IF CALCULATED AS IN THE EARLY 80'S THE RATE TODAY WOULD BE OVER 10.5%). Annual GDP growth will be between 1.5 and 1.75% in 2011. All current estimates conclude that the final year of Obama's term will show a GDP growth of less than 2.2% and unemployment still around 8.8 to 9.0%. BUT MOST DEVASTATING OF ALL, THE ANNUAL FEDERAL BUDGET DEFICIT HAS AVERAGED NEARLY 10% OF GDP (double the worst single year from 1947 to 2008).

Additionally, the financial crisis of 2008 had been mitigated by the actions of George W. Bush (TARP et al) prior to Obama assuming office and THE RECESSION WAS DECLARED OVER BY JUNE OF 2009, Just 5 months after inauguration. On the other hand the recession in play when Reagan became president was in its early stages and did not officially end until November 1982, 22 months after inauguration.

IT HAS BEEN DEBATED WHETHER JIMMY CARTER OR BARACK OBAMA IS THE EPITOME OF INCOMPETENCE IN MODERN U.S. HISTORY. While Carter made myriad mistakes and was in over his head, he did not put the country in an untenable position regarding its future. Obama has…..

http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/07/the_worst_steward_of_the_economy_in_american_history.html

The only good thing about Obama is that he’s has probably put Democrats out of power for the next twenty years which is ironic since when he was elected the pundits were talking about the Republicans being out of power for that amount of time.


Being Poor In America—Progress Style

….Census asserts a family is "poor" if its reported "income" falls below specific thresholds. The THRESHOLD FOR A FAMILY OF FOUR WAS $22,350 IN 2011.

But WHEN THEY COUNT "INCOME," CENSUS OFFICIALS IGNORE MOST WELFARE PROGRAMS such as: food stamps, public housing, energy assistance, and the earned income tax credit.

LAST YEAR, GOVERNMENT SPENT $684 BILLION ON MEANS-TESTED AID PROGRAMS PROVIDING CASH, FOOD, HOUSING, AND MEDICAL CARE TO POOR AND LOW-INCOME AMERICANS. But census officials count only about 6 percent of this as income for purposes of measuring poverty.

No surprise that the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reports that low-income Americans spend at least $1.87 for every dollar of income that the Census Bureau says they have.

This, then, is the Catch-22: THE LEFT INSISTS THAT THE GOVERNMENT SPEND MORE AND MORE TO FIGHT POVERTY, ONLY TO IGNORE THAT SPENDING WHEN COUNTING THE POOR.

The same Catch-22 shapes the class warfare debate. The left shrieks about inequality -- the gap between the rich and poor. In response, the rich are heavily taxed and hundreds of billions in resources are transferred to the poor. But, amazingly, few of those transfers are counted when the government next measures inequality.

IT'S A RIGGED GAME THE TAXPAYER CAN NEVER WIN….

http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/07/catch_22_on_poverty_and_welfare.html


Its worse that you might think. If you net out what isn’t counted as income you get $643 billion in aid. And 1 in 7 Americans amount to about 43 million people. If you divide the two numbers you come up with $15,000 per person that isn’t being counted as income. So a poor family of four could have a net income of between $60,000 and $82,000 and still be considered poor. Of course these figures are overstated because some of that money goes to bureaucrats to administer the programs, but the debate should be about reality rather than appeals to emotions.

Peggy Noonan: No one is listening

…. That's all very nice and part of Political Positioning 101, but at this point it's not helping. HE'S BECOMING BOX-OFFICE POISON. His numbers are falling. The RealClearPolitics composite job approval poll rating has him down six points since June 2, when the debt ceiling crisis began. That fall, from 52% to 46%, exactly tracks his heightened media presence and his increased attempts to be seen as dominant. PUBLIC POLICY POLLING, A DEMOCRATIC FIRM, SAID THAT IF HE RAN FOR PRESIDENT TODAY HE'D LOSE, THAT HIS JOB NUMBERS ARE "WORSE THAN THEY APPEAR," and that he continues to have real trouble with undecided voters.
And if you've watched him lately, you know why. When he speaks on the debt negotiations, he is not only extremely boring, with airy and bromidic language—really they are soul-killing, his talking points—but he never seems to be playing it straight. HE ALWAYS SEEMS TO BE FINAGLING, playing the angles in some higher game that only he gets. IN 2½ YEARS, HE HAS REACHED THE POINT THAT TOOK GEORGE W. BUSH FIVE YEARS TO REACH: PEOPLE AREN'T LISTENING ANYMORE….

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111903554904576460381949867902.html

How can you tell when Obama’s lying? Well you know the punch line for that question.


Allende: The Truth Finally Comes Out

Elected with just 36% of the vote in a split election, he believed he had a mandate to ram through a hard-core Marxist program of expropriation and indoctrination like that of his mentor, Cuba’s Fidel Castro.

In the process ALLENDE LEFT CHILE’S ECONOMY IN RUINS AND TRAMPLED THE RULE OF LAW so badly he brought his country to the brink of civil war. He was stopped only when the LEGISLATURE CHARGED HIM WITH 22 CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATIONS and ordered Chile’s military to oust him.

As Chilean jets strafed La Moneda presidential palace Sept. 11, 1973, ALLENDE SHOT HIMSELF WITH A GOLD-PLATED SUBMACHINE GUN GIVEN HIM BY CASTRO.

At the request of Allende’s family, an official investigation in May exhumed the dead man’s body, conducted forensic tests and on Tuesday FOUND THAT, YES, ALLENDE TOOK HIS OWN LIFE. It was what his family always believed, consistent with the tone of his final speech and a family history of suicides.

But rather than listen to the family, THE GLOBAL LEFT USED ALLENDE’S DEATH FOR POLITICAL PURPOSES, FALSELY CLAIMING HE WAS KILLED. They did it for one reason: to discredit America and Chile’s successful free-market reforms that stand in stark contrast to Allende’s socialist failures.

http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article/579143/201107211904/The-Lefts-Big-Lie-On-Allende.htm

Whenever a leftist claims something, it is wise to wait to see what the real story is.


What the polls are saying

New analysis by Pew Foundation on voter identification finds that, not surprisingly, “the electorate’s partisan affiliations have shifted significantly since Obama won office nearly three years ago.”

One of the most notable shifts is the GOP gain among white voters, most specifically “the young and poor.”

“A SEVEN-POINT DEMOCRATIC ADVANTAGE AMONG WHITES UNDER AGE 30 THREE YEARS AGO HAS TURNED INTO AN 11-POINT GOP ADVANTAGE TODAY. AND A 15-POINT DEMOCRATIC ADVANTAGE AMONG WHITES EARNING LESS THAN $30,000 ANNUALLY HAS SWUNG TO A SLIM FOUR-POINT REPUBLICAN EDGE TODAY.”

http://blogs.abcnews.com/thenote/2011/07/study-democrats-losing-support-of-poor-whites.html

Everything is look good for the Republicans and bad for the Democrats.

Friday, July 22, 2011

Atlas Shrugging?

Home Depot Co-Founder Blasts Obama
IBD: What's the single biggest impediment to job growth today?

Marcus: THE U.S. GOVERNMENT. Having built a small business into a big one, I can tell you that TODAY THE IMPEDIMENTS THAT THE GOVERNMENT IMPOSES ARE IMPOSSIBLE TO DEAL WITH. HOME DEPOT WOULD NEVER HAVE SUCCEEDED IF WE'D TRIED TO START IT TODAY. Every day you see rules and regulations from a group of Washington bureaucrats who know nothing about running a business. And I mean every day. It's become stifling.

If you're a small businessman, the only way to deal with it is to work harder, put in more hours, and let people go. When you consider that something like 70% of the American people work for small businesses, you are talking about a big economic impact.

IBD: President Obama has promised to streamline and eliminate regulations. What's your take?

Marcus: HIS SPEECHES ARE WONDERFUL. HIS OUTPUT IS ABSOLUTELY, INCREDIBLY BAD. As he speaks about cutting out regulations, they are now producing thousands of pages of new ones. With just ObamaCare by itself, you have a 2,000 page bill that's probably going end up being 150,000 pages of regulations.

IBD: If you could sit down with Obama and talk to him about job creation, what would you say?

Marcus: I'M NOT SURE OBAMA WOULD UNDERSTAND ANYTHING THAT I'D SAY, because he's never really worked a day outside the political or legal area. HE DOESN'T KNOW HOW TO MAKE A PAYROLL, HE DOESN'T UNDERSTAND THE PROBLEMS BUSINESSES FACE. I would try to explain that the plight of the businessman is very reactive to Washington. As Washington piles on regulations and mandates, the impact is tremendous. I don't think he's a bad guy. I just think he has no knowledge of this.

http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article/578920/201107201835/Marcus-Home-Truths-On-Jobs.aspx?src=HPLNews

Second day in a row, Obama gets an F from a business person. You don’t have to be a psychic to tell who won’t win a second term in November 2012.

The Fear based Economy

Finally, someone has publicly said what everyone has long known.

On Monday, during his company’s second quarter earnings call with investors, Wynn Resorts CEO STEPHEN WYNN ENDED THE THREE-YEAR TRUTH EMBARGO OVER WHO IS HOLDING BACK THE U.S. ECONOMY.

In July 2008, yours truly christened the economic conditions America began facing roughly a month earlier as the POR (Pelosi-Obama-Reid) Economy, named after its primary creators: House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama, and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid. In a comment at that original post, I noted that the economy’s job and wealth creators were “genuinely frightened by the lack of seriousness and presence of abject irresponsibility in Congress and in Obama.”

THIS FRIGHT WENT VIRAL LONG AGO BUT REMAINED WHISPERED IN CAREFULLY CHOSEN COMPANY UNTIL WYNN BROKE THE SILENCE. When an earnings call participant asked why his firm hasn’t expanded its meeting space in Las Vegas, Wynn responded:

I’M AFRAID TO DO ANYTHING IN THE CURRENT POLITICAL ENVIRONMENT IN THE UNITED STATES.

… my customers and the companies that provide the vitality for the hospitality and restaurant industry, in the United States of America, they are frightened of this administration. And it makes you slow down and not invest your money.

… THIS IS OBAMA’S DEAL, AND IT’S OBAMA THAT’S RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS FEAR IN AMERICA.

Why shouldn’t the economy’s key players be afraid? In 2-1/2 years, Barack Obama and his administration have shown that they will do anything in their power — even if not in their constitutional power — to further their far-left redistributionist and science-free environmental goals. IF IT MEANS SUBVERTING THE RULE OF LAW TO FAVOR BANKRUPT UNION-DOMINATED CAR COMPANIES, SO BE IT. IF IT MEANS SHUTTING DOWN OIL DRILLING AND EXPLORATION IN THE GULF OF MEXICO AND RESTORING IT IN SLOW MOTION AT A COST OF TENS OF THOUSANDS OF JOBS, WELL, THAT’S UNFORTUNATE COLLATERAL DAMAGE. IF IT MEANS REVOKING AN ALREADY-ISSUED PERMIT FOR COAL MINING, TOO BAD, SO SAD….

http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/the-fear-based-economy/

The truth is bubbling to the surface. 2012 may make the 2010 look like a walk in the park for the Democrats.



Other Business Leaders Speaking Out

3M's George Buckley, who blasted Obama last February as anti-business. "WE KNOW WHAT HIS INSTINCTS ARE," BUCKLEY SAID. "We've got a real choice between manufacturing in Canada or Mexico - which tends to be more pro-business - and America," he told the Financial Times.
Boeing's Jim McNerney, who in the Wall Street Journal last May called Obama's handpicked National Labor Relations Board's suit against his company a "FUNDAMENTAL ASSAULT ON THE CAPITALIST PRINCIPLES THAT HAVE SUSTAINED AMERICA'S COMPETITIVENESS SINCE IT BECAME THE WORLD'S LARGEST ECONOMY NEARLY 140 YEARS AGO."

Intel's Paul Otellini, who told CNET last August that the U.S. legal environment has become so hostile to business that there is likely to be "AN INEVITABLE EROSION AND SHIFT OF WEALTH, MUCH LIKE WE'RE SEEING TODAY IN EUROPE - THIS IS THE BITTER TRUTH."
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2011/07/executive_truth-tellers_about_obamas_disastrous_policies.html

It appears Atlas is awakening. Will he shrug anytime soon?

Obama predicts his record will decide the election

President Barack Obama said Wednesday that he'll be re-elected for a second term if voters feel like he's been on their side, working as hard as he can and getting things done.
"IF THEY DON'T," THE PRESIDENT SAID, "THEN I'LL LOSE."

The blunt political assessment from Obama cast next year's presidential contest as a referendum on his leadership rather than a choice between him and whoever his GOP opponent will be…..

http://www.deseretnews.com/article/700164678/Obama-says-election-assessment-of-his-leadership.html

At last something I agree with Obama on. I’ve said before, I’d vote for Donald Duck against BHO. But imagine if you are a liberal how this must make you feel. Their strategy depends on making the Republican nominee the issue.

Young Hispanics skeptical of big government

An outfit called Generation Opportunity (which boasts 842,000 friends on its “Being American” Facebook page) commissioned an online poll of adults age 18 to 29 in April from the Polling Company/Woman Trend Inc. THE MOST INTERESTING RESULTS ARE FROM YOUNG HISPANICS. THEY PREFERRED “REDUCING FEDERAL SPENDING” TO “RAISING TAXES ON INDIVIDUALS” IN ORDER TO “BALANCE THE FEDERAL BUDGET” BY 1 69%-27% MARGIN. Of these young Hispanics, 57% agreed that “if taxes on business profits were reduced, companies would be more likely to hire” and 56% agreed that “the economy grows best when individuals are allowed to create businesses without government interference.”…

http://washingtonexaminer.com/blogs/beltway-confidential/2011/07/young-hispanics-skeptical-big-government#ixzz1SkYg5LFT

Obama appears to be the Jimmy Carter of this age. Carter’s disastrous presidency soured a generation of young people in the 1980s to the Democrat Party. It appears that Obama may be doing that as well to the 2010 generation.



Murdock, Hacking, and Hypocrisy in the News Media

In December 1996, a Florida couple, John and Alice Martin, who sounded suspiciously like union goons, claimed to have inadvertently tapped into a phone conversation between then House Speaker Newt Gingrich and House Republican leadership.

According to these Democratic and union activists, THEY WERE JUST DRIVING AROUND WITH A POLICE SCANNER IN THEIR CAR, PICKED UP A RANDOM PHONE CONVERSATION AND SAID TO THEMSELVES, "WAIT A MINUTE! I COULD SWEAR THAT'S DICK ARMEY'S VOICE!"

LUCKILY, THEY ALSO HAD A TAPE RECORDER AND CASSETTE IN THEIR CAR, so they proceeded to illegally record the intercepted conversation and then turned the tape over to Democratic Rep. James McDermott -- the top Democrat on the Ethics Committee that was at that very moment investigating Gingrich.

ALTHOUGH THEY SWORE THEY HAD NO IDEA THAT WHAT THEY WERE DOING WAS A CRIME, IN THEIR COVER LETTER TO MCDERMOTT, THEY REQUESTED IMMUNITY -- just as you probably do whenever you write somebody a letter. (They later pleaded guilty to a crime under the Electronic Communications Privacy Act.)

MCDERMOTT PROMPTLY TURNED THE TAPE OVER TO THE NEW YORK TIMES and other newspapers. The Times' headline on the story, "Gingrich Is Heard Urging Tactics in Ethics Case," might as well have been titled: "TAPE SHOWS GINGRICH CONSPIRING TO ACT WITHIN THE LAW."

John Boehner, one of the participants in the Gingrich call, sued McDermott for violating his First Amendment rights, which resulted in A COURT ORDERING MCDERMOTT TO PAY BOEHNER MORE THAN $1 MILLION.

And yet, more than a dozen news organizations, many of the same ones demanding the death penalty for Rupert Murdoch right now, FILED AMICUS BRIEFS DEFENDING MCDERMOTT'S DISTRIBUTION OF THE PIRATED TAPE.

http://townhall.com/columnists/anncoulter/2011/07/20/media_mogul_charged_with_first_degree_murdoch

Hypocrisy isn’t confined to one side of the aisle. It happens on both, but the left likes to pretend they don’t do it (kind of hypocritical in itself).


BBC isn’t Bias enough claims Dr. Steve Jones

….Sometimes, in his enthusiasm to put all these evil “deniers” in their place, Dr Jones appears to forget the basic rules of science altogether. For example, HE DESCRIBES HOW MEASURED LEVELS OF ATMOSPHERIC C02 HAVE INCREASED SINCE 1959, AND HOW “BASIC PHYSICS SHOW THAT CARBON DIOXIDE IS A GREENHOUSE GAS” AND HOW “THREE INDEPENDENT SETS OF RECORDS OF GLOBAL TEMPERATURE AGREE THAT 2010 WAS ONE OF THE THREE HOTTEST YEARS SINCE FIGURES WERE FIRST COLLECTED.” Dr Jones might be surprised to learn the “deniers” agree with him on this. Where they differ is over a fundamental scientific concept: “CORRELATION IS NOT CAUSATION.” We are, remember, emerging from the Little Ice Age. So the rise in global temperatures is perfectly explicable in terms of natural climatic cycles. Furthermore, you could reasonably argue that the theory of anthropogenic CO2 as a driver of catastrophic global warming has already been “falsified” (or, as I prefer to think of it, torpedoed below the waterline, hit in the magazine and blown out of the sea). That’s because, as even THE GREAT DR PHIL JONES OF THE CRU HAS ACKNOWLEDGED, “GLOBAL WARMING” STOPPED IN 1998 (EVEN AS ANTHROPOGENIC CO2 LEVELS, NOTABLY IN CHINA) CONTINUED TO RISE.

Another category error Dr Jones falls into is in his use of the ARGUMENTUM AD VERECUNDIAM, the appeal to authority. He tells us:

The IPCC concluded that it is beyond doubt that the climate is warming and more than 90% likely that this has been driven by human activity.

And he cites an open letter to the journal Science by two hundred and fifty members of the US National Academy of Sciences:

“(T)here is compelling, comprehensive, and consistent objective evidence that humans are changing the climate in ways that threaten our societies and the ecosystems on which we depend.”
But as both Karl Popper and Thomas Kuhn could have explained to Dr Jones, SCIENCE DOES NOT ADVANCE THROUGH “CONSENSUS”; and as Einstein could have told him, science is not a numbers game. WHEN HITLER COMMISSIONED THE BOOK 100 AUTHORS AGAINST EINSTEIN, EINSTEIN COOLLY REPLIED THAT IF HE WERE WRONG, ONE AUTHOR WOULD HAVE BEEN ENOUGH….

….AS BIASED BBC NOTES, IT HAS BEEN FIVE YEARS SINCE THE BBC OFFICIALLY ABANDONED ALL PRETENCE THAT IT WAS ADOPTING A NEUTRAL POSITION ON “CLIMATE CHANGE”. In a 2007 BBC Trust policy report, it wrote:

The BBC has held a high level seminar with some of the best scientific experts (on whose and what measurement) and has come to the view that the weight of evidence no longer justifies equal space being given to the opponents of consensus….

…..DR JONES NOTES WITH CONCERN BRITAIN’S GROWING SKEPTICISM:
A poll carried out by the Cardiff University Understanding Risk Group in early 2010 showed in contrast that one in seven among the British public said that the climate is not changing and one in five that any climate change was not due to human activity. Fewer than half considered that scientists agree that humans are causing climate change.

THE CONCLUSION, HOWEVER, HE DRAWS FROM THIS IS NOT THAT THIS IS A FAIR REFLECTION OF THE LACK OF EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT CAGW THEORY – BUT THAT MEDIA ORGANISATIONS LIKE THE BBC AREN’T DOING ENOUGH TO PROMOTE THE “CORRECT” VERSION OF REALITY. “The divergence between the views of professionals versus the public may be seen as evidence of a failure by the media to balance views of very different credibility. The BBC is just one voice but so many in Britain gain their understanding of science from its output that its approach to this question must be considered.”

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100098066/bbcs-biased-climate-science-reporting-isnt-biased-enough-claims-report/


A well written article but with a couple of flaws. While scientists talk about 2010 being the warmest year on record, even by their numbers it was .05 degrees warmer than 1998 which is beyond the accuracy of the readings making up the number. And that temperature is very much questionable.

James Hansen is the director of GISS. Hansen is an outspoken advocate of man-made global warming. Hansen recently stated that “THE 12 MONTH RUNNING MEAN GLOBAL TEMPERATURE IN THE GISS ANALYSIS HAS REACHED A NEW RECORD IN 2010. THE MAIN FACTOR IS OUR ESTIMATED TEMPERATURE CHANGE FOR THE ARCTIC REGION.”

There is a MAJOR PROBLEM WITH HOW GISS MEASURES TEMPERATURE IN THE ARCTIC. THEY DON’T HAVE ANY THERMOMETERS THERE! Despite this complete lack of accurate information, GISS shows that the ARCTIC NORTH OF EIGHTY DEGREES LATITUDE WAS UP TO FOUR DEGREES WARMER THAN THE LONG TERM AVERAGE.
Science

New hope for heart disease

The revolutionary technique could transform the lives of ¬many thousands of people in Britain with ailing hearts.

Scientists have found a way to make hearts beat stronger and to even overcome the damage caused by previous heart attacks. The gene injection takes just 12 weeks to start working….

….It works by raising levels of a calcium-controlling protein in the diseased heart muscle cell to normal. A gene – called S100A1 – makes the protein which is vital for regulating the heart’s contraction. Research has shown that, in heart failure patients, the protein is massively depleted.

In the new study, researchers at Thomas Jefferson University in Philadelphia, US, injected the gene into pigs with heart failure. Twelve weeks later, the protein created by S100A1 had improved their heart function….

http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/260168/Simple-jab-that-can-cure-heart-disease

We live in an exciting age.


Liberal insanity

First we have this

WITH AN OPPRESSIVE HEAT COMES THE IMMEDIATE DEMAND FOR RELIEF — and Con Edison, the electrical utility for the New York City area, is the first one to hear those pleas from the humid masses.

A sustained heat wave means the utility sees a marked spike in electricity usage from homes and businesses. With no relief in sight — Friday’s temperatures will feel worse than Thursdays — CON EDISON OFFICIALS ARE BRACING FOR WHAT IS LIKELY TO BE A SERIES OF OUTAGES AROUND THE CITY.

http://blogs.wsj.com/metropolis/2011/07/21/con-ed-braces-for-outages-as-heat-wave-continues/?mod=google_news_blog


Then we have this story

NEW YORK CITY MAYOR MICHAEL BLOOMBERG SAID HE WILL DONATE $50 MILLION TO THE SIERRA CLUB, AN ENVIRONMENTAL ADVOCACY GROUP, TO PROMOTE THE ORGANIZATION’S FIGHT AGAINST COAL-FIRED POWER PLANTS.
http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2011/07/21/bloomberg-gives-sierra-club-50-million-to-fight-coal-plants/


So we have NYC facing rolling blackout even while it’s mayor funds an organization lobbying to stop the building of power plants that could avoid the blackouts. Don’t let anyone tell you that liberals are on your side. They’re there to do what they consider is best for you.