Thursday, September 2, 2010

A week's worth of postings


Anti Muslim America

We are hearing a lot of how hateful the American public is regarding Muslims due to the overwhelming opposition to the Ground Zero Mosque. But is that true? What do the statistics show?

Regardless, 2001 was the zenith or, looked at through the prism of our national shame, the nadir of the much-discussed anti-Muslim backlash in the United States. The following year, the number of anti-Islamic hate-crime incidents (overwhelmingly, nonviolent vandalism and nasty words) dropped to 155. In 2003, there were 149 such incidents. And the number has hovered around the mid-100s or lower ever since.

Sure, even one hate crime is too many. But does that sound like a anti-Muslim backlash to you?
Let's put this in even sharper focus. America is, outside of Israel ,probably the most receptive and tolerant country in the world to Jews. And yet, in every year since 9/11, more Jews have been hate-crime victims than Muslims. A lot more.

In 2001, there were twice as many anti-Jewish incidents as there were anti-Muslim, again according to the FBI. In 2002 and pretty much every year since, anti-Jewish incidents have outstripped anti-Muslim ones by at least 6 to 1. Why aren't we talking about the anti-Jewish climate in America?

Because there isn't one. And there isn't an anti-Muslim climate either

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-0824-goldberg-islamophobia-20100824,0,6090115.column


Dorsal Fins in the Water


How we got to where we are; the arrogance of power. It appears humility will come with a high price to this administration and the Democrat Party.

At the beginning of the year, retiring seven-term representative Marion Berry (D., Ark.) recounted a conversation he had with the president. Obama's unrelenting push for health-care reform in the face of public opposition reminded Berry of the Clinton-era missteps that led to the Republican rout of the Democrats in 1994. "I began to preach last January that we had already seen this movie and we didn't want to see it again because we know how it comes out," Berry told a newspaper.

Convinced that his popularity was eternal, Obama responded by saying, yes, but there's a "big difference" between 1994 and 2010, and that big difference is, "you've got me."

The funny thing is, Obama might have been right. Because things might be much worse for Democrats in 2010 than they were in 1994 - and the big difference might well be Barack Obama.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2010/08/27/dorsal_fins_surround_white_house_106918.htm

The Most Fiscally Irresponsible Government in U.S. History

Current federal budget trends are capable of destroying this country
By Mortimer B. Zuckerman

There is an instinctive conclusion among the American public that President Obama's stimulus package has failed to create a sustained recovery. Unemployment has increased, not declined; consumers have retrenched; housing starts have crashed along with mortgage applications; and there is a fear that a double-dip recession may very well be in the pipeline. The public perception, reflected in Pew Research/National Journal polls, is that the measures to combat the Great Recession have mostly helped large banks and financial institutions, and that's a view common to Republicans (75 percent) and Democrats (73 percent). Only one third of either political leaning thinks government policies have done a great deal or a fair amount for the poor.

It ends with:

Obama must know that if he doesn't address this, he will be the president who drove us toward a debt crisis. And so too must Congress, for both have now participated in the most fiscally irresponsible government in American history.

http://politics.usnews.com/opinion/mzuckerman/articles/2010/08/26/the-most-fiscally-irresponsible-government-in-us-history.html

Caddell on the Midterm Elections

The polling figures paint an astounding picture -- and not just for Democrats, but for the political class as a whole.

In Jimmy Carter’s White House, Patrick Caddell was, in the words of Teddy White, the “house Cassandra” — an all-too-candid pollster whose prophecies spooked the president’s other advisors. Three decades later, Caddell again is warning his fellow Democrats about electoral doom. As he sips an iced tea over lunch in midtown Manhattan, Caddell sighs and tells me that the lessons of the Carter years appear to be all but forgotten by the current crop of Democrats in Washington.

“President Obama’s undoing may be his disingenuousness,” Caddell says. After campaigning for post-partisanship, Obama, he observes, has lurched without pause to the left. “You can’t get this far from what you promised,” Caddell says, “especially when people invest in hope — you must understand that obligation. The killer in American politics is disappointment. When you are elected on expectations, and you fail to meet them, your decline steepens.”

http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/245438/caddell-midterm-elections-robert-costa

Republican energy for the upcoming election.

Here is an interesting fact from the recent primaries.

Florida held those primaries on Tuesday. The victory of black Congressman Kendrick Meek in the Democratic primary all but seals a November win for Rubio because Crist needed Florida's black vote to win as an independent. Those voters will stick with Meek, whom the Democratic Party cannot abandon, thus sinking Crist.

More interesting is that in a state with 17% more Democrats than Republicans, 37% more Republicans than Democrats cast ballots in the primary, showing the enthusiasm of Republicans for their candidate.

http://spectator.org/archives/2010/08/27/primary-lessons

Remember Fearless Fosdick?

Here was a cartoon policeman who would get giant bullet holes in his head and it was never more than a “flesh wound.” It appears the Democrats may need to be the political equivalent of Fearless Fosdick if they want to get out the November elections alive.

Unemployment 9/5%Stock Market down 11% this year Housing sales lowest since they began keeping trackIllegal immigration and the Justice Department case against ArizonaEconomic policies that caused Zuckerman to write an op-ed entitled "The Most Fiscally Irresponsible Government in U.S. History"Deficit spending of 146 billion dollars per month under ObamaHealthcare which the majority of Americans want repealedThe fast and professional handling of the BP oil spill by this administrationAn arrogance by the Democrat elites that has them disregard what the people wantThe realization that Obama is WAY over his HEAD.
UB professor predicts House will go to Republicans

A University at Buffalo political scientist with a sterling record of prognosticating presidential elections is predicting that Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi will turn over her gavel to the GOP come January.

The presiding Democrats stand to lose about 51 seats in November, says James E. Campbell, professor of political science at UB. His prediction stems from a crystal ball filled with scientific equations based on polling and current events, all pointing to a stunning reversal of fortune for Democrats, who took over the House in 2006.

http://www.buffalonews.com/city/capital-connection/washington/article175227.ece

Obama, Democrats got 88 percent of 2008 contributions by TV network execs, writers, reporters



Senior executives, on-air personalities, producers, reporters, editors, writers and other self-identifying employees of ABC, CBS and NBC contributed more than $1 million to Democratic candidates and campaign committees in 2008, according to an analysis by The Examiner of data compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics.


The Democratic total of $1,020,816 was given by 1,160 employees of the three major broadcast television networks, with an average contribution of $880.



By: Hugh Hewitt
The American Enterprise Institute's Arthur Brooks has quite accurately described America as a 70/30 nation, with the 70 percent presently massively underrepresented in the federal government, the Manhattan-Beltway media elite and academia.

The 70 percent is appalled by the placebo economics practiced by the president and the Congress over the past two years, shocked by its profligacy with the wealth of the republic, and sickened by the looting of the next generation's opportunities.


The 70 percent did not want Obamacare, but it has been thrust upon them.


The 70 percent did not want federal judges to declare "game over" in the complex discussion of what marriage is and means.


The 70 percent want a fence on the border that works, and do not want their concern over unregulated immigration dismissed as nativisim. ......


Two years into what had been sold as a new politics and a new approach, the 70 percent are fully aware that they have been conned, suckered…….

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/columns/Seventy-percent-of-Americans-know-they_ve-been-conned-639878-101758743.html#ixzz0y59TmYQM

The Greening of Godzilla


Watching the colossal and implosive decline of the once mighty green movement to stop global warming has been an educational experience. It’s rare to see so many smart, idealistic and dedicated people look so clueless and fail so completely. From the anti-climax of the Cluster of Copenhagen, when world leaders assembled for the single most unproductive and chaotic global gathering ever held, the movement has gone from one catastrophic failure to the next.Has any public pressure group ever spent so much direct mail and foundation money for such pathetic results?


The standard rap on the greens is that they failed because they were too environmentalist. Their pure and naive ideals were no match for the evil, ugly forces of real world politics. Beautiful losers, they dared to dream a dream too gossamer winged, too delicate for the harsh light of day. Bambi, meet Godzilla; the butterfly was broken on the wheel.


Even in defeat, the greens can’t get it right. The greens didn’t fail because they were too loyal to their ideals; they failed because lost touch with the core impetus and values of the environmental movement. Bambi wasn’t crushed by Godzilla; Bambi turned into Godzilla, and the same kind of public skepticism and populism that once fueled environmentalism have turned against it.


Here are some thoughts scattered throughout the piece."The greens have forgotten where they come from. Modern environmentalism was born in the reaction against Big Science, Big Government and Experts. ""Environmentalists were skeptics of the One Big Fix. Science could never capture all the side effects and the unintended consequences. Read it all



PRINCETON, NJ — Republicans lead by 51% to 41% among registered voters in Gallup weekly tracking of 2010 congressional voting preferences. The 10-percentage-point lead is the GOP’s largest so far this year and is its largest in Gallup’s history of tracking the midterm generic ballot for Congress.


These results are based on aggregated data from registered voters surveyed Aug. 23-29 as part of Gallup Daily tracking. This marks the fifth week in a row in which Republicans have held an advantage over Democrats — one that has ranged between 3 and 10 points.


The Republican leads of 6, 7, and 10 points this month are all higher than any previous midterm Republican advantage in Gallup’s history of tracking the generic ballot, which dates to 1942. Prior to this year, the highest such gap was five points, measured in June 2002 and July 1994. Elections in both of these years resulted in significant Republican gains in House seats.





Bad news for Democrats: Ohio voters long for Bush


From PPP:


We’ll start rolling out our Ohio poll results tomorrow but there’s one finding on the poll that pretty much sums it up: by a 50-42 margin voters there say they’d rather have George W. Bush in the White House right now than Barack Obama.


Independents hold that view by a 44-37 margin and there are more Democrats who would take Bush back (11%) than there are Republicans who think Obama’s preferable (3%.)


A couple months ago I thought the Pennsylvanias and Missouris and Ohios of the world were the biggest battlegrounds for 2010 but when you see numbers like this it makes you think it’s probably actually the Californias and the Wisconsins and the Washingtons.


That’s gotta hurt. The Buckeye State this year features races for Governor, Secretary of State, Attorney General, Auditor, U.S. Senate, and at least five competitive House districts currently held by Democrats


http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/bad-news-for-democrats-ohio-voters-long-for-bush-101901978.html#ixzz0yDVoeKSF


AP-GfK Poll: Most attuned voters tilt toward GOP


WASHINGTON – Americans with the strongest opinions about the country's most divisive issues are largely unhappy with how President Barack Obama is handling them, an ominous sign for Democrats hoping to retain control of Congress in the fall elections.


In nine of 15 issues examined in an Associated Press-GfK Poll this month, more Americans who expressed intense interest in a problem voiced strong opposition to Obama's work on it, including the economy, unemployment, federal deficits and terrorism. They were about evenly split over the president's efforts on five issues and strongly approved of his direction on just one: U.S. relationships with other countries.


In another danger sign for Democrats, most Americans extremely concerned about 10 of the issues say they will vote for the Republican candidate in their local House race. Only those highly interested in the environment lean toward the Democrats.


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100831/ap_on_el_ge/us_ap_poll_election_issues;_ylt=AtLmKxgwdm8lzMeufZR4EOes0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTN1ZDB1MXZuBGFzc2V0A2FwLzIwMTAwODMxL3VzX2FwX3BvbGxfZWxlY3Rpb25faXNzdWVzBGNjb2RlA21vc3Rwb3B1bGFyBGNwb3MDNwRwb3MDNARwdANob21lX2Nva2UEc2VjA3luX2hlYWRsaW5lX2xpc3QEc2xrA2FwLWdma3BvbGxtbw

No comments:

Post a Comment