Showing posts with label class racism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label class racism. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 21, 2012

Things turn against Obama

What’s new Today

Our #1 story looks at Obama from his speeches and his budgets and tells you what it tells us of Obama.  #2 looks at 2008 and points out the Achilles’ heel in his victory.  It seem 77% of his majority came from 3 state with just 104 electoral votes.  #3 is really bad news for Obama.  Gallup has taken their poll and found unemployment in February will be 9%.  #4 is more bad news for Obama with 18 indicators that economy is in the tank.  You’ll see these numbers more as the fall approaches.  #5 looks at how Obama simply disregards the law.  #6 shows how America is growing in our domestic oil production while #7 is an Obama ad that makes you ask is it racist?  Finally we find that Germany and it’s leap to be the solar capital of the world has lost it about 99 cents out of every dollar invested. 


1. The Real Obama

President Obama’s budget for 2013 is pure Obama. How do we know? Paul Ryan, the House Budget Committee chairman, was once asked how to become a budget expert. “You have to read the budget,” he said. To know Obama, it’s similar. You have to read the speeches and look over the budgets….

I’ve gleaned his views from the two budgets and from the “reducing the budget” speech in April 2011, the address to a special session of Congress on jobs in September 2011, the speech at Osawatomie, Kansas, last December, and the State of the Union address last month. Here’s what the president not only believes but is committed to:

(1) America is an unjust and deeply unfair country. ..

(2) A looming debt crisis? Forget it. Obama hardly mentioned the deficit or the national debt in the State of the Union, though his budget has a $1.3 trillion deficit, and the debt is rising past $16 trillion into a fiscal danger zone. If he’s worried, he hasn’t let on in any serious way.

(3) Government spending is better at spurring the economy than private investment….

(4) Tax reform should flush loopholes and special breaks out of the tax code, broaden the base, and raise tax rates for the well-to-do. This isn’t bipartisan tax reform in which cutting income tax rates for everyone is one of the most important aspects—far from it.

(5) When the rich get richer, the middle class and poor get worse off…Obama doesn’t believe in a growing economic pie.

(6) Conservative, free market economics is a plague. Obama describes it as an economic system that tells Americans, “You’re on your own.” In his view, it consists of cutting taxes for the rich and gutting regulations of every kind.

Even worse, Obama said at Osawatomie, “it doesn’t work. It has never worked.…

(7) Medicare and Medicaid are not big problems...


This article spells it out pretty well.  Obama’s has identified the wrong problems, has the wrong solutions and is wrong on just about every proposal he’s made. 





2.   2008 Election:  Not as big a win for Obama as it looked like

…In 2008, Obama won the popular vote by about nine and a half million votes. However, roughly 7.2 million of that margin came from huge wins in California, New York, and Illinois - states that he's going to win in pretty much any imaginable scenario. His massive margins in these states distorts the results of national polling by giving Obama a massive stash of surplus voters (equal to about 5.3% of the vote in 2008) who cannot shift a single Electoral Vote. If, instead of looking at the national vote, you look at the margins in swing states it becomes clear that the 2008 result was actually much closer than it looks at first glance.

If we begin using the 2008 map with the 2012 distribution of Electoral Votes, the initial Electoral Vote count would be, as mentioned above, 359-179.

Moving 1657 votes from the Democratic to the Republican column in Nebraska gives the Republicans the vote from that state's Second Congressional District and makes it 358-180.

A swing of 7089 votes in North Carolina gives us 343-195.

Switching 14,196 votes in Indiana changes the final result to 332-206.

118,225 voters in Florida would give that state to the GOP, putting the count at 303-235.

It would take only 131,112 votes to give Ohio to the Republicans, putting us at 285-253.

117,264 Virginians makes it 272-266.

And, finally, 73,281 votes would be enough to give Iowa (and the White House) to the Republican with 272 Electoral Votes to Obama's 266.

In this scenario, by the way, Obama would win 8,624,332 more votes than the Republican nominee, giving him a victory in the popular vote of 6.57%...


This is another major problem for Obama.  I didn’t realize how close Obama actually was in the country if you eliminate California, New York and Illinois.  76% of his victory total came from those three states. 



3.  Gallup:  Unemployment for February 9.0%

Unemployment in the U.S. rose to nine percent in mid-February, up from 8.3 percent a month earlier, according to a new Gallup survey. The polling company said this suggests that it is “premature” to assume the economy will not feature prominently in the 2012 election season.

Gallup figures typically provide an indication of what the government will report at the end of the month.

“The U.S. unemployment rate, as measured by Gallup without seasonal adjustment, is 9.0% in mid-February,” Gallup said in its mid-month unemployment survey, released on February 17. “The mid-month reading normally reflects what the U.S. government reports for the entire month, and is up from 8.3% in mid-January.”

Gallup said the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) would likely report a rise in the official unemployment rate in early March, when it publishes its February figures.

Gallup’s mid-month figures are not seasonally adjusted, and so may not predict the official unemployment rate precisely. However, because Gallup and BLS both conduct their unemployment surveys at the same time – in the middle of the month – Gallup’s early figures can provide a barometer of where the official rate is likely headed…

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/gallup-finds-unemployment-climbing-nine-percent-february

This is actually what the unemployment rate in January should have been.



4.  18 Signs the Economy is in trouble



The following are 18 statistics that prove that the economy has not improved since Barack Obama became the president of the United States….

#1 Today there are 88 million working age Americans that are not employed and that are not looking for employment. That is an all-time record high.

#2 When Barack Obama was elected, the percentage of unemployed Americans that had been out of work for more than 52 weeks was less than 15%. Today, it is above 30%.

#3 There are 1.2 million fewer jobs in America today than there were when Barack Obama was inaugurated.

#4 When Barack Obama first took office, the number of “long-term unemployed workers” in the United States was approximately 2.6 million. Today, that number is sitting at 5.6 million.

#5 The average duration of unemployment in the United States is hovering close to an all-time record high.

#6 During the Obama administration, worker health insurance costs have risen by 23 percent.

#7 Since Barack Obama has been president, the average price of a gallon of gasoline in the United States has increased by 90 percent.

#8 Since Barack Obama has been president, home values in the United States have declined by another 13 percent.

#9 Under Barack Obama, new home sales in the U.S. set a brand new all-time record low in 2009, they set a brand new all-time record low again in 2010, and they set a brand new all-time record low once again during 2011.

#10 Since Barack Obama took office, the number of Americans living in poverty has risen by more than 6 million.

#11 Since Barack Obama entered the White House, the number of Americans on food stamps has increased from 32 million to 46 million.

#12 The amount of money that the federal government gives directly to Americans has increased by 32 percent since Barack Obama entered the White House.

#13 According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the percentage of Americans living in “extreme poverty” is now sitting at an all-time high.

#14 When Barack Obama first took office, an ounce of gold was going for about $850. Today an ounce of gold costs more than $1700 an ounce.

#15 Since Barack Obama became president; the size of the U.S. national debt has increased by 44 percent.

#16 During Barack Obama’s first two years in office, the U.S. government added more to the U.S. national debt than the first 100 U.S. Congresses combined.

#17 During the Obama administration, the U.S. government has accumulated more debt than it did from the time that George Washington took office to the time that Bill Clinton took office.

#18 The U.S. national debt has been increasing by an average of more than 4 billion dollars per day since the beginning of the Obama administration.

Oh, but Barack Obama is promising that things will be much better very soon. Barack Obama is pledging that 2 million more jobs will be added to the economy in 2012.


18 reasons Obama will be defeated in November. 





5.  Obama’s disregard for the Law

The willingness of the White House to exceed the Constitutional powers of the President and assert authority beyond that directed in federal statutes is starting to show up more frequently. In the past week on American Thinker, John F. DeLeo documented President Obama's deliberate expansion of the United States' Export Import Bank to turn it into a lender competing with ordinary banks, rather than a prudent facilitator of American companies' ability to engage in foreign commerce.

Obama's willingness to take over companies and bully lenders into giving up their priority rights to be paid their capital back was evident at the beginning of his term, in the cases of the GM and Chrysler bailouts. The other day, he moved unilaterally to change the defense capability of the nation by decreeing the destruction of hundreds of nuclear weapons to a level far below that the Senate authorized in a recent treaty with Russia. Also Joe Newby of the Spokane Examiner reports that on Thursday, House Speaker John Boehner told radio talk show host Laura Ingraham that he has "great concerns" the President may be overstepping his Constitutional authority in bypassing Congress on laws regarding mortgages and student loans.

Under the radar, another very current Obama move is seeking to create applicable law in the field of coastal zone regulation, respecting the oceans and the Great Lakes. The common law and Constitutional tradition of the United States provides that states own and govern the natural resources under public waters in their territory.  Nevertheless, since 2010, when he created an Ocean Policy Council, Obama has directed that the federal government agencies conduct themselves according to United Nations "sustainability" doctrine and treaties not ratified by the Senate of the United States. The fruition of this effort is imminent, and it will put a federal roadblock on coastal zone development by imposing requirements not contained in existing statutes such as the Clean Water Act. The Republican leadership in Congress has complained to no avail. The deadline for public comments on the Draft Implementation Plan closes in a few days, on February 27th. I hope interested states and companies will point out the overreach, but most are not focused on the issue….


Obama is seeking to rule rather than to govern.



6.  Oil succeeding despite Obama

This is one of those articles that, after your read it, your eyes are bugging out of your head.

An incredible oil boom is underway, destroying the government's measely estimates for production and getting the US to the point where we will soon challenge Saudi Arabia for the world's biggest producer.


The United States' rapidly declining crude oil supply has made a stunning about-face, shredding federal oil projections and putting energy independence in sight of some analyst forecasts.

After declining to levels not seen since the 1940s, U.S. crude production began rising again in 2009. Drilling rigs have rushed into the nation's oil fields, suggesting a surge in domestic crude is on the horizon.

The number of rigs in U.S. oil fields has more than quad­rupled in the past three years to 1,272, according to the Baker Hughes rig count. Including those in natural gas fields, the United States now has more rigs at work than the entire rest of the world.


This despite the fact that the federal government has cut back on the land available for drilling.  This boom is happening on state and private land. 



7.  African Americans for Barack Obama

Here’s an interesting political ad by President Obama calling for African Americans to support him.  I wonder what would be said if a Republican set up a website and had a message, White Americans for (name).  Do you think that would be considered racist? 






8.  The benefits of solar in Germany

The skeptical environmentalist himself, Bjorn Lomborg, reports at Slate that despite the fact that "Germany once prided itself on being the 'photovoltaic world champion,'" now "Germany is cutting solar-power subsidies because they are expensive and inefficient." These statistics are incisive:

"Moreover, this sizeable investment does remarkably little to counter global warming. Even with unrealistically generous assumptions, the unimpressive net effect is that solar power reduces Germany's CO2 emissions by roughly 8 million metric tons-or about 1 percent - for the next 20 years. To put it another way: By the end of the century, Germany's $130 billion solar panel subsidies will have postponed temperature increases by 23 hours.

Using solar, Germany is paying about $1,000 per ton of CO2 reduced. The current CO2price in Europe is $8. Germany could have cut 131 times as much CO2 for the same price. Instead, the Germans are wasting more than 99 cents of every euro that they plow into solar panels."


Another liberal fantasy bites the dust.  Solar may be a fuel of the future, but a distant future. 


Friday, October 1, 2010

32 Days to go

Obama and Education


This would have been a great opportunity for Matt Lauer to ask about the 216. Who are the 216? Like each of the families in Waiting for
Superman, thousands of parents in Washington, D.C., are dying to get their children out of violent and non-functioning local public schools and into alternatives like the Sidwell School that President Obama chooses to send his kids too.


One-thousand-seven-hundred low-income D.C. school children have
attended private schools with the help of the $7,500 scholarships awarded
through this D.C. Opportunity Scholarship program.


In the fall of 2008, 216 new low-income students were notified by
the Department of Education that they had been selected to receive scholarships.
These kids had their winning lottery tickets in hand. Then President Barack
Obama was elected with the help of the National Education Association and the
American Federation of Teachers. At the behest of Obama’s union allies,
Secretary of Education Arne Duncan sent letters to the 216 families informing
them that he was taking back the $7500 in scholarship money that the D.C.
Opportunity Scholarship program had previously awarded them. In
other words, President Barack Obama tore up their winning lottery tickets.


The article goes on to point out how much better the kids on the scholarship did than the rest of the students in the DC district. It appears for all his rhetoric, Obama really doesn’t believe in giving the poor a fair shot or at least the same shot he wants his children to have.



Class racism


Is class hatred equivalent of racism? Seems to be a good case for it using class elimination like genocide. The left loves to call the right racists even while they urge on class envy.

Naimark, author of the controversial new book Stalin’s Genocides,
argues that we need a much broader definition of genocide, one that includes
nations killing social classes and political groups. His case in point:
Stalin.


The book’s title is plural for a reason: He argues that the Soviet
elimination of a social class, the kulaks (who were higher-income farmers), and
the subsequent killer famine among all Ukrainian peasants – as well as the
notorious 1937 order No. 00447 that called for the mass execution and exile of
“socially harmful elements” as “enemies of the people” – were, in fact,
genocide.


Is murdering a class somehow better than murdering a race? Is
fomenting class-hatred somehow better than fomenting race-hatred?



Here’s an interesting read that may lead you to buy a new book. If you are a Catholic, a former Catholic or just someone interested in religious history this seems fascinating.

In Hull’s thesis, the Sixties revolution in Roman Catholic practice was
in large measure a result of the Counter-Reformation and Vatican I
centralization of power in the papacy: In the traditional understanding, the
pope was the “custodian” of tradition — but the response to the Protestant
Reformation and the French Revolution made Catholicism expand that role
significantly, from “custodian” to “arbiter” (the quoted words are Hull’s). The
need for a strong defense against outside attacks on the Church made Catholics
rally around the pope, in the name of orthodoxy, little intending that that same
power could eventually be deployed in the interest of heterodoxy. (They might in
this sense have benefited from an understanding of O’Sullivan’s First Law:
“All organizations that are not actually right-wing will over time become
left-wing.” In this ecclesial case, of course, the contrast would
not be the political one between right-wing and left-wing, but rather one
between tradition and experimentation.)


http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/248138/what-happened-fifties-catholicism-mike-potemra


Senate blocks recess appointments with deal between Dems, GOP


Senate Democrats agreed Wednesday night to a Republican demand to block
President Obama from making recess appointments while Congress is out of town
campaigning for the midterm elections.Democratic leaders have agreed to schedule pro-forma sessions of the Senate every week over the next six weeks, a move that will prevent Obama from making emergency appointments, according to Senate sources briefed on the talks.

http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/121775-senate-blocks-recess-appointments

Every administration uses recess appointments to some extent, but Obama has raised the use of it beyond people stuck in committee to those who have never had any had any Senatorial scrutiny.


Without a defendable record, Democrats try pounding the table


It is a lawyers' adage: If you have the law on your side, argue the
law; if you have the facts, argue the facts; if you have neither, pound the
table.
Forgive the Democrats for their current table-pounding.

They cannot run on their record, which has
two pillars. One is the stimulus that did not stimulate as they said it would
(or else unemployment would not be above 8 percent). The report that the
recession ended in June 2009 means the feeble recovery began before stimulus
spending really started.


The second pillar is the health-care legislation. This may not be
(as suggested by Michael Barone, author of the Almanac of American Politics) the
most unpopular major legislation since the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854. But it
remains as unpopular as it was when the administration told Americans to pipe
down and eat their broccoli.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/09/29/AR2010092905608.html?hpid=opinionsbox1

I agree with Will but want to add one thing. It appears the recovery is getting weaker and this coincides with the gearing up and spending of the stimulus.

Why Dems Are Going Down in November


Unless something totally unforeseen occurs, Democrats are poised to take a
real beating in November. Their response to the impending disaster has run the
gamut. Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi is in denial: "One thing I know for
sure is that Democrats will retain their majority in the House of
Representatives." Massachusetts Senator John Kerry is condescending: "We have an electorate that doesn't always pay that much attention to what's going on, so
people are influenced by a simple slogan rather than the facts or the truth or
what's happening." President Obama is angry: "It is inexcusable for any Democrat
or progressive right now to stand on the sidelines in this midterm election."
Why is the electorate ready to kick Democrats to the curb? Here's why:

http://jewishworldreview.com/0910/ahlert.php3

An excellent summary of the problems, arrogance, and stupidity that is bringing an end to the Democrats 40 years in power 38 years early.

The Arrogance of the Left

When America votes for a liberal candidate, it is redeemed by the left
as intelligent -- and derided as dense when it does not. We were told not to
worry that Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner did not pay all his income taxes
since we were lucky to have someone so well educated and experienced in high
finance.


Note that few Democratic candidates are running on the health-care
bill they passed, promising at the time that it would be appreciated by a
suspicious American public. More federal borrowing and amnesty are still pushed
under the euphemisms "stimulus" and "comprehensive immigration reform." House
Speaker Nancy Pelosi claimed that the tea party movement was merely a synthetic Astroturf movement. Professors and preachers may like such sermonizing, but for politicians it's a lousy way to get elected. Again, compare the relative fates of the patronizing Adlai Stevenson and the plain-speaking Harry
Truman.


http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2010/09/30/democrats_cling_to_arrogance.html

I do believe the Democrats are in phase two of the five stages of grief—anger.


The Middle Has Swung Against Dems

WASHINGTON -- Sometimes the most important clues are hiding in plain view.
That was the case in late June, when the Gallup Organization reported that the
share of voters who describe themselves as conservative had increased from 37
percent to 42 percent in the past two years.That does not sound like a big
change. But given the long-term stability of these basic philosophical
alignments, the reaction it measured to the economic troubles and the
performance of the new Democratic administration is very significant....

This is an excellent article and concludes with the paragraph below.


But if Gallup is right, and I believe its methodology is solid, there simply
are fewer liberal votes to be won this time
. And, as the Third Way memo says, "While the middle has always played a pivotal role in American electoral
politics, where they swing this fall will certainly decide the fate of the
Democratic majority."