Showing posts with label The poor. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The poor. Show all posts

Sunday, May 6, 2012

Four Years of Obama overcomes Eight Years of Reagan

What’s new Today

Story #1 is a continuation of what is going on with Elizabeth Warren’s story.  #2  looks at George Orwell and the left’s position.  Are they trying to uplift the poor or simply use them?  #3 looks at the unemployment rate…the real unemployment rate. 


Today’s thoughts

From the graph you can see how 4 years of Obama cancels out 8 years of Reagan.  Of course I think that’s what the left has had in mind all along.

The half-filled room at Ohio State is a big mistake for a campaign especially in its first official campaign event.  But the signs are all there for Obama’s coming defeat: difficulty raising money, unfilled seats at rallies, and mistakes galore such as Julia, Hilary Rosen’s attack on Ann Romney, etc.

President Obama told supporters this weekend that his re-election bid is still about "hope" and "change."  The problem is that the hoped for change is a new President.





1.  Harvard and the Female Indian

….Ms. Warren parlayed a not overtly distinguished college and law school career into a tenured position at Harvard Law School. On leave from there, she went to work for the Administration as chair of the Troubled Relief Asset Program and Assistant to the President and Special Advisor to the Secretary of the Treasury for the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

From that spot, the ever ambitious Ms Warren decided to run against Senator Scott Brown for the Senate. Like Martha Coakley before her, she obviously viewed the former Kennedy seat as a given for whichever Democrat garnered the nomination.

Now, however, obviously for the first time in her career, she is being closely vetted, and in the process she turns out to be an autobiography fabulist, as well as an embodiment for what's wrong with using "diversity" to fill academic slots.

It seems that Ms Warren, who had an 1/32 or  maybe even 1/64 American Indian Heritage and who had never suffered any disadvantage on account of her assumed but unverifiable heritage, had held herself out as a member of a minority group in the Association of American Law Schools Directory, and she maintained that listing, and Harvard bragged of it in hiring her, until sometime after the hire when she and the school dropped the issue.

Ms. Warren at first claimed, as did some academic supporters, that that minority listing had nothing to do with her hiring….


Oh what tangled webs we weave….







2.  Truth and the Left

What, if any, is the connection between illiteracy and ideology?

George Orwell, our greatest political sociologist, has some ideas.  He is the master explainer of governance, power, totalitarianism, education, and the dynamics of class warfare.  It's an ugly picture.

In his seminal essay, “Ignorance is Strength”   Orwell lays down the iron rule of history: "Throughout recorded time, and probably since the end of the Neolithic Age, there have been three kinds of people in the world[:] High, Middle, and Low."

Orwell cynically notes that the Middle always campaign for power by promising the Low that they will be moved toward the top.  In fact, if the Middle are able to seize power, they establish themselves as the High, the Low are crushed, and that's the end of the story until the next Middle become powerful enough to start another cycle.

Orwell concludes: "As soon as they have reached their objective, the Middle thrust the Low back into their old position of servitude, and themselves become the High."

Many observers would say, especially with Obama in the White House, that we are witnessing an attempted coup by the current Middle -- intellectuals, academics, ideologues, journalists, thinkers, and talkers (i.e., people who feel entitled to run the world because they are so smart).  This hungry Middle wants to take power from the bankers, tycoons, entrepreneurs, and industrialists -- the movers and organizers who have run the world for several centuries.

But let's focus on the Low -- can they improve their lives by siding with the Middle in this ongoing coup attempt?  Will the Middle, this time, actually try to lift up the Low?

Orwell's essay is depressing because he sees no hope that the Low can ever improve their condition.  In his view, the Middle are always liars, manipulators, and exploiters, despite their honeyed promises….




This does sound familiar and the left certainly seems to be using this strategy.  Broken promises litter the progressive’s agenda. 







3.   What’s the Real Unemployment Rate?



…So what is the true state of the labor market?

1. If the size of the U.S. labor force as a share of the total population was the same as it was when Barack Obama took office—65.7% then vs. 63.6% today—the U-3 unemployment rate would be 11.1%.

Now, this doesn’t take into account the aging of the Baby Boomers, which should lower the participation due to rising retirements. But is that still a valid assumption given the drop in wealth since 2006?

2. If you take into account the aging of the Baby Boomers, the participation rate should be trending lower. Indeed, it has been doing just that since 2000. Before the Great Recession, the Congressional Budget Office predicted what the participation rate would be in 2012, assuming such demographic changes. Using that number, the real unemployment rate would be 10.7%.

3. Of course, the participation rate usually falls during recessions. Yet even if you discount for that and the aging issue, the real unemployment rate would be 9.3%.

4. If the participation rate just stayed where it was last month, the unemployment rate would have risen to 8.4%.

5. Then there’s the broader, U-6 measure of unemployment which includes the discouraged plus part-timers who wish they had full time work. That unemployment rate, perhaps the truest measure of the labor market’s health, is still a sky-high 14.5%.

6. The employment-population ratio dipped to 58.4% vs. 61% in December 2008. A historically and alarmingly low level of the U.S. population is actually working.

7. And given that real disposable income has been flat the past two years, it stands to reason that many of the jobs being created are in low-wage sectors. Indeed, hiring in sectors such as retail and leisure has accounted for a whopping 40 percent of the jobs added over the past two years.

The labor market remains in sad shape—despite Obama White House claims that it’s “continuing to heal”—and it is unlikely to improve much if the economy continues to grow around 2% or so…

http://blog.american.com/2012/05/the-awful-april-jobs-report-is-the-real-unemployment-rate-11-1/

This is akin to a doctor claiming he has cured a particular disease.  Of course his definition of curing the disease includes deaths.   

Tuesday, January 31, 2012

Obama doublecrosses the Catholic Church

What’s new Today

Story #1 is on a huge story that I posted yesterday and one that is growing in importance.  It has to do with Obamacare and the Catholic Church. This is really a stupid move by Obama in an election year.  #2 basically tells you it doesn’t matter who wins the GOP primaries because whoever the Republican is, they will be president.  It isn’t a question of can that person beat Obama.  They can.  #3 is also a breaking story.  It seem Freddie Mac is making money by keeping people in high rate mortgages.  It isn’t what they are supposed to do and it is contributing to the housing decline.  #4 comes from a Rasmussen poll.  It seems the poor consume like everyone else, that is they have much of the creature comforts of the 21st Century. #5 is the latest on the Occupy Movement.   





1.    Obama Double-crosses Catholics

… Catholic leaders are still trying to process the implications of this ambush. The president had every opportunity to back down from confrontation. In the recent ­Hosanna-Tabor ruling, a unanimous Supreme court reaffirmed a broad religious autonomy right rooted in the Constitution. Obama could have taken the decision as justification for retreat.

And it would have been a minor retreat. The administration was on the verge of mandating nearly universal contraceptive coverage through Obamacare without public notice. There would have been no controversy at all if President Obama had simply exempted religious institutions and ministries. But the administration insisted that the University of Notre Dame and St. Mary’s Hospital be forced to pay for the privilege of violating their convictions…

… Both radicalism and maliciousness are at work in Obama’s decision — an edict delivered with a sneer. It is the most transparently anti-Catholic maneuver by the federal government since the Blaine Amendment was proposed in 1875 — a measure designed to diminish public tolerance of Romanism, then regarded as foreign, authoritarian and illiberal….

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/obamas-radical-power-grab-on-health-care/2012/01/30/gIQANB7XdQ_story.html

It seems Obama is intent on insulting every potential constituent group in America. 



2.  The GOP primaries:  It doesn’t matter

…Mitt Romney will beat Barack Obama because a majority of the country already knows that the president is an epic failure at his job, and a thin-skinned, self-absorbed ideologue to boot.

All the noise about Romney's wealth and the nonsense about his "effective tax rate" won't make a lick of difference to a voter afraid of losing his or her job or fearing for their children's future.

All the left's harrumphing about Bain just isn't going matter to a country desperate for competence and character, discipline and the values of hard work, thrift and sacrifice.

Everybody already knows everything the Chicago gang is going to throw at Romney thanks to Newt. After the intensity of the nomination battle drains away, the focus will shift back to the president's massive incompetence, and ho-him will be the response when yet another Democrat with talking points about Romney tries to evade the reality of an unemployment rate that have never been below 8 percent when the president promised it would never go above that level.

To his great credit, Newt hasn't played the anti-Mormon card and the left certainly will, but that, too, is drained of its power after the campaign of 2008 and the pulverizing realities of the economic mismanagement of the past three years.

When Truman was forced from office, just as LBJ was, and when Carter and George H.W. Bush were denied second terms, the elections were about the overwhelming sense that the country needed a U-turn.

That's what the cover on Time proclaimed when below the smiling picture of Reagan on its November 17, 1980, election "special edition" appeared the words "A Fresh Start."

That is what November's vote will be about as well, and the memories and relevance of the primary battles will be long gone. The GOP's primary battles didn't matter in 1952 or 1980, and they won't matter in 2012


Obama is toast.  When the actual campaign begins, expect Obama to throw everything he can against the Republicans, and expect the Republicans to let you hear Obama saying over and over again all the miraculous things he was going to do.  And then expect the announcer to tell you what the actual numbers are. 





3.   Freddie Mac betting against Homeowners



...Freddie Mac, a taxpayer-owned mortgage company, is supposed to make homeownership easier. One thing that makes owning a home more affordable is getting a cheaper mortgage.



But Freddie Mac has invested billions of dollars betting that U.S. homeowners won't be able to refinance their mortgages at today's lower rates, according to an investigation by NPR and ProPublica, an independent, nonprofit newsroom.



These investments, while legal, raise concerns about a conflict of interest within Freddie Mac.



"We were actually shocked they did this," says Scott Simon, who heads the mortgage-backed securities team at the giant bond trading and investment firm called PIMCO. "It seemed so out of line with their mission, out of line with what Congress wanted them to do."…



….public documents show that in 2010 and 2011, Freddie Mac set out to make gains for its own investment portfolio by using complex mortgage securities that brought in more money for Freddie Mac when homeowners in higher interest-rate loans were unable to qualify for a refinancing.



Those trades "put them squarely against the homeowner," PIMCO's Simon says.



Freddie Mac's trades came at a time when mortgage rates were falling to record lows. Millions of homeowners wish they could refinance, but their lenders tell them they can't qualify for today's low rates because of tight rules. Freddie Mac is one of the gatekeepers with the power to set those rules, and lately, it has been saying no more often to homeowners….






If you read my blog you know how I feel about Fannie and Freddie.  But this one is totally new to me.  We really need to abolish both Freddie and Fannie. 





4.  Poor consume like everyone else



Says Rasmussen, “About 40 million Americans are officially defined as living below the poverty line. Yet most of those have adequate levels of food, shelter, clothing and medical care. Sixty-three percent of American adults believe such a family is not living in poverty,” he writes. “Only 16 percent believe that a family is living in poverty if it has two color televisions, cable or satellite TV, a DVD player, and a VCR, but that’s what the average family living in poverty has as defined by the U.S. government,” he adds.



Rasmussen, who condemns Washington for ignoring the public’s will to run out sky-high deficits, doesn’t mean to criticize households with earnings of $22,314, the 2010 poverty level for a family of four, but finds that the nation believes too much is being spent on welfare.



According to his polling in the new book, 71 percent believe too many are receiving federal welfare benefits and would like to see official measures of poverty tightened to reduce the number of eligible participants.



The president, however, is going the other way and even reviving plans to help homeowners refinance their mortgages, an idea similar to a stimulus-era idea that in part led to the Tea Party movement. Plus, Rasmussen reveals, the administration’s spending on means-tested programs like food stamps, public housing assistance, weatherization spending and others “is slated to continue growing dramatically even after the recession comes to an end.”






I think what shows the hardships the poor go through.  How many people not in poverty have a VCR?



5.  Is OWS just like the TEA Party?  I don’t think so

Not only are the occupiers, who represent 1% of Americans, destructive, as shown by the recent Oakland, California rampage they are filled with hate and bigotry.

Listen to an occupier recite this twisted, prejudicial "Pledge" while happily burning the American flag. Not too surprisingly, not even our quoted article yesterday on the Oakland occupiers mentioned it.

“I pledge allegiance to a flag of the imperialistic, capitalistic dictatorship.

And to the plutocracy for which it stands, depravity owned central bank, under the Jews.

With inequality and injustice for the 99.”


It appears the left version of the TEA Party is all the things the left thinks the TEA Party is.